首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Motor Performance Assessment in Parkinson’s Disease: Association between Objective In-Clinic Objective In-Home and Subjective/Semi-Objective Measures
【2h】

Motor Performance Assessment in Parkinson’s Disease: Association between Objective In-Clinic Objective In-Home and Subjective/Semi-Objective Measures

机译:帕金森氏病的运动表现评估:客观临床客观在家和主观/半客观测量之间的关联

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Advances in wearable technology allow for the objective assessment of motor performance in both in-home and in-clinic environments and were used to explore motor impairments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aims of this study were to: 1) assess differences between in-clinic and in-home gait speed, and sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit duration in PD patients (in comparison with healthy controls); and 2) determine the objective physical activity measures, including gait, postural balance, instrumented Timed-up-and-go (iTUG), and in-home spontaneous physical activity (SPA), with the highest correlation with subjective/semi-objective measures, including health survey, fall history (fallers vs. non-fallers), fear of falling, pain, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and PD stage (Hoehn and Yahr). Objective assessments of motor performance were made by measuring physical activities in the same sample of PD patients (n = 15, Age: 71.2±6.3 years) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 35, Age: 71.9±3.8 years). The association between in-clinic and in-home parameters, and between objective parameters and subjective/semi-objective evaluations in the PD group was assessed using linear regression-analysis of variance models and reported as Pearson correlations (R). Both in-home SPA and in-clinic assessments demonstrated strong discriminatory power in detecting impaired motor function in PD. However, mean effect size (0.94±0.37) for in-home measures was smaller compared to in-clinic assessments (1.30±0.34) for parameters that were significantly different between PD and healthy groups. No significant correlation was observed between identical in-clinic and in-home parameters in the PD group (R = 0.10–0.25; p>0.40), while the healthy showed stronger correlation in gait speed, sit-to-stand duration, and stand-to-sit duration (R = 0.36–0.56; p<0.03). This suggests a better correlation between supervised and unsupervised motor function assessments in healthy controls compared to PD group. In the PD group, parameters related to velocity and range-of-motion of lower extremity within gait assessment (R = 0.58–0.84), and turning duration and velocity within iTUG test (R = 0.62–0.77) demonstrated strong correlations with PD stage (p<0.01).
机译:可穿戴技术的进步可以客观评估家庭和临床环境中的运动表现,并被用于探索帕金森氏病(PD)中的运动障碍。这项研究的目的是:1)评估PD患者的临床和家庭步态速度以及坐姿,站立和站立时间之间的差异(与健康对照相比);和2)确定客观的体育锻炼量度,包括步态,姿势平衡,仪器定时走步(iTUG)和家庭自发体育锻炼(SPA),与主观/半客观量度的相关性最高,包括健康状况调查,跌倒历史记录(跌倒者与非跌倒者),对跌倒的恐惧,疼痛,帕金森病统一疾病评估量表和PD阶段(Hoehn和Yahr)。通过测量同一PD患者(n = 15,年龄:71.2±6.3岁)和年龄匹配的健康对照者(n = 35,年龄:71.9±3.8岁)中的体育活动,对运动表现进行客观评估。使用线性回归分析方差模型评估PD组的临床和室内参数之间,客观参数与主观/半客观评估之间的关联,并报告为Pearson相关性(R)。在家中的SPA和临床评估均显示出强大的辨别力,可以检测出PD的运动功能受损。然而,与PD和健康组之间参数显着不同的临床评估(1.30±0.34)相比,家庭测量的平均效应大小(0.94±0.37)要小。 PD组在相同的室内和室内参数之间未观察到显着相关性(R = 0.10–0.25; p> 0.40),而健康人在步态速度,坐着站立时间和站立状态方面显示出更强的相关性。上座时间(R = 0.36-0.56; p <0.03)。这表明与PD组相比,健康对照者在有监督和无监督运动功能评估之间有更好的相关性。在PD组中,步态评估中与下肢的速度和运动范围有关的参数(R = 0.58–0.84),在iTUG测试中与转弯持续时间和速度有关的参数(R = 0.62–0.77)证明与PD阶段密切相关(p <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号