首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Budget Constraints Affect Male Rats’ Choices between Differently Priced Commodities
【2h】

Budget Constraints Affect Male Rats’ Choices between Differently Priced Commodities

机译:预算限制影响雄鼠在不同价格商品之间的选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Demand theory can be applied to analyse how a human or animal consumer changes her selection of commodities within a certain budget in response to changes in price of those commodities. This change in consumption assessed over a range of prices is defined as demand elasticity. Previously, income-compensated and income-uncompensated price changes have been investigated using human and animal consumers, as demand theory predicts different elasticities for both conditions. However, in these studies, demand elasticity was only evaluated over the entirety of choices made from a budget. As compensating budgets changes the number of attainable commodities relative to uncompensated conditions, and thus the number of choices, it remained unclear whether budget compensation has a trivial effect on demand elasticity by simply sampling from a different total number of choices or has a direct effect on consumers’ sequential choice structure. If the budget context independently changes choices between commodities over and above price effects, this should become apparent when demand elasticity is assessed over choice sets of any reasonable size that are matched in choice opportunities between budget conditions. To gain more detailed insight in the sequential choice dynamics underlying differences in demand elasticity between budget conditions, we trained N=8 rat consumers to spend a daily budget by making a number of nosepokes to obtain two liquid commodities under different price regimes, in sessions with and without budget compensation. We confirmed that demand elasticity for both commodities differed between compensated and uncompensated budget conditions, also when the number of choices considered was matched, and showed that these elasticity differences emerge early in the sessions. These differences in demand elasticity were driven by a higher choice rate and an increased reselection bias for the preferred commodity in compensated compared to uncompensated budget conditions, suggesting a budget context effect on relative valuation.
机译:需求理论可用于分析人类或动物消费者如何在一定预算范围内改变其对商品的选择,以响应这些商品的价格变化。在一定价格范围内评估的消费变化被定义为需求弹性。以前,由于需求理论预测了两种情况下的不同弹性,因此使用人类和动物消费者研究了有收入补偿和无收入补偿的价格变化。但是,在这些研究中,需求弹性仅在预算中的所有选择中进行了评估。由于补偿预算改变了相对于无补偿条件可获得的商品数量,从而改变了选择数量,因此尚不清楚预算补偿是否仅通过从不同选择总数中抽样就对需求弹性产生微不足道的影响,还是直接影响选择弹性消费者的顺序选择结构。如果预算环境独立地改变商品之间的选择,而不仅仅是价格影响,那么当根据在预算条件之间的选择机会中匹配的任何合理规模的选择集评估需求弹性时,这将变得显而易见。为了更深入地了解预算条件之间需求弹性差异背后的顺序选择动力学,我们训练了N = 8只老鼠消费者,通过大量的nose口获得在不同价格体制下的两种流动性商品来花费每日预算。而且没有预算补偿我们确认,在补偿的预算条件和未补偿的预算条件下,两种商品的需求弹性都不同,而且当考虑的选择数量匹配时,这些弹性的差异也会在会议开始时出现。需求弹性的这些差异是由较高的选择率和有偿的首选商品与未补偿的预算条件相比增加的重选偏差所驱动的,这表明预算背景对相对估值的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号