首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Classification models for subthreshold generalized anxiety disorder in a college population: Implications for prevention
【2h】

Classification models for subthreshold generalized anxiety disorder in a college population: Implications for prevention

机译:高校人口中亚阈以下广泛性焦虑症的分类模型:对预防的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders on college campuses and often goes unidentified and untreated. We propose a combined prevention and treatment model composed of evidence-based self-help (SH) and guided self-help (GSH) interventions to address this issue. To inform the development of this stepped-care model of intervention delivery, we evaluated results from a population-based anxiety screening of college students. A primary model was developed to illustrate how increasing levels of symptomatology could be linked to prevention/treatment interventions. We used screening data to propose four models of classification for populations at risk for GAD. We then explored the cost considerations of implementing this prevention/treatment stepped-care model. female), 8.0% (198/2489) met DSM-5 clinical criteria for GAD, in line with expected clinical rates for this population. At-risk Model 1 (subthreshold, but considerable symptoms of anxiety) identified 13.7% of students as potentially at risk for developing GAD. Model 2 (subthreshold, but high GAD symptom severity) identified 13.7%. Model 3 (subthreshold, but symptoms were distressing) identified 12.3%. Model 4 (subthreshold, but considerable worry) identified 17.4%. There was little overlap among these models, with a combined at-risk population of 39.4%. The efficiency of these models in identifying those truly at risk and the cost and efficacy of preventive interventions will determine if prevention is viable. Using Model 1 data and conservative cost estimates, we found that a preventive intervention effect size of even 0.2 could make a prevention/treatment model more cost-effective than existing models of “wait-and-treat.”
机译:广泛性焦虑症(GAD)是大学校园中最常见的精神疾病之一,常常无法识别和治疗。我们提出了一种综合的预防和治疗模型,该模型由循证自助(SH)和指导自助(GSH)干预措施组成,以解决此问题。为了指导这种干预措施的逐步护理模型的发展,我们评估了基于人群的大学生焦虑筛查的结果。开发了一个主要模型来说明症状水平的提高如何与预防/治疗干预措施联系起来。我们使用筛选数据为GAD风险人群提出了四种分类模型。然后,我们探讨了实施这种预防/治疗逐步护理模式的成本考虑因素。女性),其中8.0%(198/2489)符合DSM-5的GAD临床标准,符合该人群的预期临床率。高风险模型1(阈值以下,但有明显的焦虑症状)确定13.7%的学生有发展GAD的潜在风险。模型2(低于阈值,但GAD症状严重程度较高)确定为13.7%。模型3(阈值以下,但症状令人不安)确定为12.3%。模型4(低于阈值,但有很多担忧)确定为17.4%。这些模型之间几乎没有重叠,合并的高风险人群为39.4%。这些模型在识别那些真正处于危险中的模型的效率以及预防性干预措施的成本和有效性将决定预防是否可行。使用模型1的数据和保守的成本估算,我们发现,预防干预效果的大小即使为0.2,也可以使预防/治疗模型比现有的“等待与治疗”模型更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号