首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Demonstration Project in New York and Virginia: Retrofitting Cost-Effective Roll-over Protective Structures (CROPS) on Tractors
【2h】

A Demonstration Project in New York and Virginia: Retrofitting Cost-Effective Roll-over Protective Structures (CROPS) on Tractors

机译:纽约和弗吉尼亚州的一个示范项目:在拖拉机上改造具有成本效益的侧翻保护结构(CROPS)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The NIOSH cost-effective roll-over protective structure (CROPS) demonstration project sought to determine whether three prototype roll-over protective structures (ROPS) designed to be retrofitted on Ford 8N, Ford 3000, Ford 4000, and Massey Ferguson 135 tractors could be installed in the field and whether they would be acceptable by the intended end users (farmers). There were a total of 50 CROPS demonstrators (25 in New York and 25 in Virginia), with 45 observers attending the New York CROPS demonstrations and 36 observers attending the Virginia CROPS demonstrations, for a total of 70 participants in New York and 61 in Virginia. The oldest retrofitted tractors were 77 to 62 years old, while the newest retrofitted tractors were 40 to 37 years old. The most frequently retrofitted tractor in the CROPS demonstration project was a Ford 3000 series tractor (n = 19; 38%), followed by Ford 4000 (n = 11; 22%), Massey Ferguson 135 (n = 11; 22%), and Ford 8N (n = 9; 18%). A major issue of CROPS retrofitting was the rear wheel fenders. The effort involved in disassembling the fenders (removing the old bolts was often faster by cutting them with a torch), modifying the fender mounting brackets, and then reinstalling the fenders with the CROPS generally required the most time. In addition, various other semi-permanent equipment attachments, such as front-end loaders, required additional time and effort to fit with the CROPS. Demonstrators were asked to rank the reasons why they had not retrofitted their tractors with ROPS until they had enrolled in the CROPS demonstration program. ROPS “cost too much” was ranked as the primary reason for participants in both states (80% for New York and 88% for Virginia). The second highest ranked reasons were “ROPS wasn’t available” for Virginia (80%) and “hassle to find ROPS” for New York (69%). The third highest ranked reasons were “not enough time to find ROPS” for New York (67%) and “hassle to find ROPS” for Virginia (79%). All demonstrators and observers indicated that they were glad to have participated in the CROPS project.
机译:NIOSH具有成本效益的翻车保护结构(CROPS)示范项目试图确定是否可以设计用于福特8N,Ford 3000,Ford 4000和Massey Ferguson 135拖拉机的三个原型翻车保护结构(ROPS)。是否已安装在现场以及预期的最终用户(农民)是否可以接受。共有50位CROPS示威者(纽约25位,弗吉尼亚25位),其中45位观察员参加了纽约CROPS示威活动,36位观察员参加了弗吉尼亚CROPS示威,在纽约共有70位参与者,在弗吉尼亚州共有61位参与者。最旧的改装拖拉机为77至62岁,而最新的改装拖拉机为40至37岁。在CROPS示范项目中,最经常改装的拖拉机是福特3000系列拖拉机(n = 19; 38%),其次是福特4000(n = 11; 22%),梅西·弗格森135(n = 11; 22%),和福特8N(n = 9; 18%)。 CROPS改装的主要问题是后轮挡泥板。拆卸挡泥板所涉及的工作(通过割炬将旧螺栓拆除通常会更快一些),修改挡泥板安装支架,然后通常需要最多时间用CROPS重新安装挡泥板。此外,各种其他半永久性设备附件(例如前端装载机)需要花费更多的时间和精力才能适合CROPS。示威者被要求对在参加CROPS示范计划之前不使用ROPS改装拖拉机的原因进行排序。 ROPS“成本过高”被列为这两个州参与者的主要原因(纽约州为80%,弗吉尼亚州为88%)。排名第二高的原因是弗吉尼亚州(80%)的“无法使用ROPS”和纽约州(69%)的“很难找到ROPS”。排名第三高的原因是纽约的“没有足够的时间来找到ROPS”(67%)和弗吉尼亚的“没有足够的时间来找到ROPS”(79%)。所有示威者和观察员表示,他们很高兴参加了CROPS项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号