首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effect of Integrated Water-Nutrient Management Strategies on Soil Erosion Mediated Nutrient Loss and Crop Productivity in Cabo Verde Drylands
【2h】

Effect of Integrated Water-Nutrient Management Strategies on Soil Erosion Mediated Nutrient Loss and Crop Productivity in Cabo Verde Drylands

机译:养分综合管理策略对佛得角旱地土壤侵蚀介导的养分流失和作物生产力的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Soil erosion, runoff and related nutrient losses are a big risk for soil fertility in Cabo Verde drylands. In 2012, field trials were conducted in two agro-ecological zones to evaluate the effects of selected techniques of soil-water management combined with organic amendments (T1: compost/manure + soil surfactant; T2: compost/animal or green manure + pigeon-pea hedges + soil surfactant; T3: compost/animal or green manure + mulch + pigeon-pea hedges) on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses in eroded soil and runoff and on crop yields. Three treatments and one control (traditional practice) were tested in field plots at three sites with a local maize variety and two types of beans. Runoff and eroded soil were collected after each erosive rain, quantified, and analysed for NO3-N and PO4-P concentrations. In all treatments runoff had higher concentrations of NO3-N (2.20-4.83 mg L-1) than of PO4-P (0.02-0.07 mg L-1), and the eroded soil had higher content of PO4-P (5.27-18.8 mg g-1) than of NO3-N (1.30-8.51 mg g-1). The control had significantly higher losses of both NO3-N (5.4, 4.4 and 19 kg ha-1) and PO4-P (0.2, 0.1 and 0.4 kg ha-1) than the other treatments. T3 reduced soil loss, runoff and nutrient losses to nearly a 100% while T1 and T2 reduced those losses from 43 to 88%. The losses of NO3-N and PO4-P were highly correlated with the amounts of runoff and eroded soil. Nutrient losses from the applied amendments were low (5.7% maximum), but the losses in the control could indicate long-term nutrient depletion in the soil (19 and 0.4 kg ha-1 of NO3-N and PO4-P, respectively). T1-T3 did not consistently increase crop yield or biomass in all three sites, but T1 increased both crop yield and biomass. We conclude that T3 (combining crop-residue mulch with organic amendment and runoff hedges) is the best treatment for steep slope areas but, the pigeon-pea hedges need to be managed for higher maize yield. T1 (combining organic amendment with soil surfactant) could be a better choice for flatter areas with deeper soils.
机译:土壤侵蚀,径流和相关养分流失是佛得角旱地土壤肥力的重大风险。 2012年,在两个农业生态区进行了田间试验,以评估所选土壤水管理技术与有机改良剂(T1:堆肥/粪便+土壤表面活性剂; T2:堆肥/动物或绿肥+鸽子-豌豆树篱+土壤表面活性剂; T3:堆肥/动物粪便或绿肥+覆盖物+木豆篱笆)侵蚀土壤和径流中氮(N)和磷(P)的损失以及作物产量。在三个地方使用本地玉米品种和两种豆类的田间田地中测试了三种处理方法和一种对照(传统做法)。每次侵蚀性降雨后收集径流和侵蚀土壤,进行定量并分析NO3-N和PO4-P的浓度。在所有处理中,径流中的NO3-N(2.20-4.83 mg L -1 )浓度高于PO4-P(0.02-0.07 mg L -1 ),并且侵蚀土壤的PO4-P含量(5.27-18.8 mg g -1 )高于NO3-N(1.30-8.51 mg g -1 )。对照组的NO3-N(5.4、4.4和19 kg ha -1 )和PO4-P(0.2、0.1和0.4 kg ha -1 )的损失明显更高)比其他方法。 T3将土壤流失,径流和养分流失减少到近100%,而T1和T2将这些流失从43%减少到88%。 NO3-N和PO4-P的损失与径流和侵蚀土壤的量高度相关。施用的修正物造成的养分损失很低(最大值为5.7%),但对照中的损失可能表明土壤中的养分长期枯竭(19和0.4 kg ha -1 的NO3-N和PO4-P)。 T1-T3并没有在所有三个地点持续提高作物产量或生物量,但是T1却同时提高了作物产量和生物量。我们得出的结论是,T3(将农作物残茬覆盖物与有机改良剂和径流篱笆相结合)是对陡坡地区的最佳处理方法,但是,为了提高玉米产量,需要对木豆篱笆进行管理。 T1(将有机改良剂与土壤表面活性剂结合使用)对于土壤较深的平坦区域可能是更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号