首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Better to Be in Bad Company than to Be Alone? Aedes Vectors Respond Differently to Breeding Site Quality in the Presence of Others
【2h】

Better to Be in Bad Company than to Be Alone? Aedes Vectors Respond Differently to Breeding Site Quality in the Presence of Others

机译:比一个人还难做坏人?在其他动物的存在下伊蚊载体对繁殖场所质量的反应不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study focuses on two competing species, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), both invasive mosquitoes of the New World. Context-specific competition between immature forms inside containers seems to be an important determinant of the coexistence or displacement of each species in different regions of the world. Here, competition experiments developed at low density (one, two or three larvae) and receiving four different resource food concentration, were designed to test whether Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti respond differently to competition, and whether competition can be attributed to a simple division of resources. Three phenotypic traits - larval development, adult survival under starvation and wing length - were used as indicators of performance. Larvae of neither species were limited by resource concentration when they were alone, unlike when they developed with competitors. The presence of conspecifics affected Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, inducing slower development, reduced survival and wing length. The response to resource limitation was different when developing with heterospecifics: Ae. aegypti developing with one heterospecific showed faster development, producing smaller adults with shorter lives, while in the presence of two competitors, development increased and adults lived longer. Aedes albopictus demonstrated a better performance when developing with heterospecifics, with no loss in their development period and improved adult survival. Overall, our results suggest that response to competition can not simply be attributed to the division of resources, and that larvae of both species presented large phenotypic plasticity in their response to the presence or absence of heterospecifics and conspecifics.
机译:这项研究的重点是两个竞争物种,埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊(双翅目:葫芦科),它们都是新世界的入侵蚊子。容器内未成熟形式之间的特定于上下文的竞争似乎是决定世界上不同地区每种物种共存或迁移的重要决定因素。在这里,设计了低密度(一,两个或三个幼虫)并接受四种不同资源食物浓度的竞争实验,以测试Ae是否有效。白化病和Ae。埃及人对竞争的反应不同,竞争是否可以归因于简单的资源分配。三个表型性状-幼虫发育,饥饿下的成活率和翅长-被用作性能指标。这两个物种的幼虫在单独时都受到资源集中度的限制,这与它们与竞争者一起发育不同。物种的存在影响了Ae。埃及和埃及。白化病,导致发育缓慢,生存期缩短和机翼长度减少。当开发具有异特质的产品时,对资源限制的反应是不同的:具有一种异种特异性的埃及埃及人的发育显示出较快的发育,从而产生了寿命较短的较小的成年成年人,而在有两个竞争者的情况下,发育加快了,成年人的寿命更长。白纹伊蚊表现出更好的性能与异特异性一起发展时,其发展期间没有损失,提高了成年生存率。总的来说,我们的结果表明,对竞争的反应不能简单地归因于资源的分配,而且两种物种的幼虫在对异种和同种物种存在或不存在的反应中均表现出较大的表型可塑性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号