首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Non-repeatable science: assessing the frequency of voucher specimen deposition reveals that most arthropod research cannot be verified
【2h】

Non-repeatable science: assessing the frequency of voucher specimen deposition reveals that most arthropod research cannot be verified

机译:不可重复的科学:评估凭证标本的放置频率表明大多数节肢动物研究无法得到证实

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Scientific findings need to be verifiable and grounded in repeatability. With specimen-level research this is in part achieved with the deposition of voucher specimens. These are labeled, curated, data-based specimens that have been deposited in a collection or museum, available for verification of the work and to ensure researchers are calling the same taxa by the same names. Voucher specimens themselves are the subject of research, from the discovery of new species by taxonomists to ecologists documenting historical records of invasive species. Our objective was to quantify the frequency of voucher specimen deposition in biodiversity and community ecology research through a survey of the peer-reviewed literature about arthropods, from 1989 until 2014. Overall rates of voucher deposition were alarmingly low, at under 25%. This rate increased significantly over time, with 35% of papers reporting on vouchers in 2014. Relative to the global mean, entomological research had a significantly higher rate of voucher deposition (46%), whereas researchers studying crustaceans deposited vouchers less than 6% of the time, significantly less than the mean. Researchers working in museums had a significantly higher frequency of voucher deposition. Our results suggest a significant culture shift about the process of vouchering specimens is required. There must be more education and mentoring about voucher specimens within laboratories and across different fields of study. Principal investigators and granting agencies need a proactive approach to ensuring specimen-level data are properly, long-term curated. Editorial boards and journals can also adopt policies to ensure papers are published only if explicit statements about the deposition of voucher specimens is provided. Although the gap is significant, achieving a higher rate of voucher specimen deposition is a worthy goal to ensure all research efforts are preserved for future generations.
机译:科学发现必须是可验证的,并且要以重复性为基础。通过样本级别的研究,这可以部分通过凭证样本的沉积来实现。这些标有标签,经过整理,基于数据的标本已存放在收藏或博物馆中,可用于验证作品并确保研究人员以相同的名称称呼同一分类单元。凭证标本本身就是研究的主题,从分类学家发现新物种到记录入侵物种历史记录的生态学家。我们的目标是通过对1989年至2014年间关于节肢动物的同行评审文献进行的调查来量化生物多样性和社区生态学研究中凭证标本的沉积频率。凭证沉积的总体比率低得令人震惊,低于25%。随着时间的流逝,该比率显着增加,2014年有35%的论文报告了凭单。相对于全球平均水平,昆虫学研究的凭单沉积率更高(46%),而研究甲壳类的凭单存入凭证的人不到6%。时间,明显少于平均值。在博物馆工作的研究人员有更高的代金券存放频率。我们的结果表明,需要对标本凭证过程进行重大的文化转变。必须在实验室内以及跨不同的研究领域对凭证样本进行更多的教育和指导。首席研究人员和资助机构需要采取积极主动的措施,以确保适当,长期地管理标本水平的数据。编辑委员会和期刊也可以采取政策,以确保只有在提供了有关凭证标本存放的明确声明后才发表论文。尽管差距很大,但要确保将所有研究成果保留给子孙后代,还是要实现更高的凭证样本沉积率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号