首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage Central Philippines
【2h】

Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage Central Philippines

机译:扩大菲律宾中部佛得角岛航道的海洋保护区网络规模扩大的好处和挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Locally-established marine protected areas (MPAs) have been proven to achieve local-scale fisheries and conservation objectives. However, since many of these MPAs were not designed to form ecologically-connected networks, their contributions to broader-scale goals such as complementarity and connectivity can be limited. In contrast, integrated networks of MPAs designed with systematic conservation planning are assumed to be more effective—ecologically, socially, and economically—than collections of locally-established MPAs. There is, however, little empirical evidence that clearly demonstrates the supposed advantages of systematic MPA networks. A key reason is the poor record of implementation of systematic plans attributable to lack of local buy-in. An intermediate scenario for the expansion of MPAs is scaling up of local decisions, whereby locally-driven MPA initiatives are coordinated through collaborative partnerships among local governments and their communities. Coordination has the potential to extend the benefits of individual MPAs and perhaps to approach the potential benefits offered by systematic MPA networks. We evaluated the benefits of scaling up local MPAs to form networks by simulating seven expansion scenarios for MPAs in the Verde Island Passage, central Philippines. The scenarios were: uncoordinated community-based establishment of MPAs; two scenarios reflecting different levels of coordinated MPA expansion through collaborative partnerships; and four scenarios guided by systematic conservation planning with different contexts for governance. For each scenario, we measured benefits through time in terms of achievement of objectives for representation of marine habitats. We found that: in any governance context, systematic networks were more efficient than non-systematic ones; systematic networks were more efficient in broader governance contexts; and, contrary to expectations but with caveats, the uncoordinated scenario was slightly more efficient than the coordinated scenarios. Overall, however, coordinated MPA networks have the potential to be more efficient than the uncoordinated ones, especially when coordinated planning uses systematic methods.
机译:事实证明,当地建立的海洋保护区可实现当地规模的渔业和保护目标。但是,由于许多MPA并非旨在形成生态连接的网络,因此它们对诸如互补性和连通性之类的更广泛目标的贡献可能会受到限制。相比之下,通过系统的保护规划设计的MPA集成网络在生态,社会和经济方面都比本地建立的MPA更为有效。但是,几乎没有经验证据清楚地证明了系统MPA网络的假定优势。一个关键原因是由于缺乏本地支持而导致执行系统计划的记录很差。扩大海洋保护区的一个中间场景是扩大地方决策,从而通过地方政府及其社区之间的合作伙伴关系来协调由当地推动的海洋保护区计划。协调有可能扩展单个MPA的利益,并且有可能接近系统性MPA网络提供的潜在利益。我们通过模拟菲律宾中部Verde Island Passage的七个MPA扩展方案,评估了扩展本地MPA形成网络的好处。方案是:基于社区的MPA建立不协调;两种情况反映了通过合作伙伴关系实现MPA协调扩展的程度不同;以及以不同环境进行治理的系统保护规划为指导的四种方案。对于每种情况,我们根据实现海洋栖息地代表性目标的时间来衡量收益。我们发现:在任何治理环境中,系统网络都比非系统网络更有效;在更广泛的治理环境中,系统的网络效率更高;而且,与预期相反,但有一些警告,未协调的方案比协调的方案效率更高。总体而言,协调的MPA网络比未协调的网络更有效率,特别是在协调计划使用系统方法的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号