首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effect of Peginterferon or Ribavirin Dosing on Efficacy of Therapy With Telaprevir in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Advanced Liver Fibrosis
【2h】

Effect of Peginterferon or Ribavirin Dosing on Efficacy of Therapy With Telaprevir in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Advanced Liver Fibrosis

机译:聚乙二醇干扰素或利巴韦林剂量对治疗经验丰富的慢性丙型肝炎和晚期肝纤维化患者的特拉帕韦治疗效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We investigated the safety, efficacy, and impact of ribavirin and peginterferon dose reduction on complete early virologic response and sustained virologic response (SVR) to triple therapy with telaprevir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced liver fibrosis.Treatment was initiated for 211 patients who failed treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, with bridging fibrosis (F3, n = 68) or cirrhosis (F4, n = 143), including 103 (49%) null-responders (NR), 30 (14%) partial responders (PR), and 78 (37%) relapsers (REL). Impaired liver function (ILF) platelets <100,000/mm3 or albumin <35 g/L were present in 40 patients. The distribution of hepatitis C virus subtypes was: 1a, 1b, or 1, with undetermined subtype for 10 (5%), 187 (89%), and 14 (6%) patients, respectively. Treatment was started with peginterferon alpha-2a or alpha-2b, ribavirin, and telaprevir at standard doses.The overall SVR24 rate was 56% and was lower in cirrhotic patients (NR: 35%, PR: 40%, and REL: 63%, respectively) than in patients with bridging fibrosis (NR: 50%, PR: 75%, and REL: 75%, respectively). The lowest probability of SVR24 was in NRs with ILF (26%). The SVR24 rate significantly decreased in NRs receiving <60% vs >60% of the total ribavirin dose (23% vs 44%, respectively) or <80% vs >80% of the total ribavirin dose (33% vs 48%, respectively). A significant SVR24 decrease was noted subsequent to a total peginterferon dose reduction, both when comparing patients who received <60% vs >60% of the total dose (NR: 0% vs 44%; REL: 33% vs 68%) and patients who received <80% vs >80% of the total dose (NR: 17% vs 50%; REL: 46% vs 71%).Serious adverse events were observed in 31 patients (15%). Deaths occurred in 4 patients. All of the deceased subjects were cirrhotic members of the ILF (baseline serum albumin level <35 g/L and/or platelet count <100,000/mm3) group.Ribavirin dose reduction did not affect efficacy in REL but did in NR. Peginterferon dose reduction decreased the SVR24 rate for all groups, particularly in prior NR. ILF increased the risk of fatal complications with a low probability to achieve SVR24. One solution might be to provide wide and early access to novel, efficient, and safe interferon-free combinations to treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with liver cirrhosis.
机译:我们研究了利巴韦林和聚乙二醇干扰素剂量减少对经验丰富的晚期肝纤维化患者进行三联疗法治疗时,对telaprevir进行完全早期病毒学应答和持续病毒学应答(SVR)的安全性,有效性和影响。开始治疗211例失败的患者聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗,桥接纤维化(F3,n = 68)或肝硬化(F4,n = 143),包括103(49%)无效者(NR),30(14%)部分反应者(PR),和78(37%)个复发者(REL)。 40例患者的肝功能(ILF)血小板<100,000 / mm 3 或白蛋白<35μg/ L。丙型肝炎病毒亚型的分布为:1a,1b或1,其中亚型未定的分别为10(5%),187(89%)和14(6%)患者。开始使用标准剂量的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a或α-2b,利巴韦林和telaprevir进行治疗。肝硬化患者的总SVR24率为56%,较低(NR:35%,PR:40%,REL:63%分别比桥接纤维化患者(NR:50%,PR:75%和REL:75%)高。 SVR24发生率最低的是有ILF的NR(26%)。 NRs接受病毒唑总剂量的<60%比> 60%(分别为23%和44%)或<80%vs> 80%(分别为33%vs 48%)时,SVR24率显着降低。 )。当比较接受总剂量<60%对> 60%的患者(NR:0%对44%; REL:33%对68%)和患者时,peginterferon总体剂量减少后,SVR24明显降低接受总剂量的<80%vs> 80%(NR:17%vs 50%; REL:46%vs 71%)。在31例患者中观察到严重不良事件(15%)。 4例患者死亡。所有死者均为ILF肝硬化成员(基线血清白蛋白水平<35μg/ L和/或血小板计数<100,000 / mm 3 )。利巴韦林剂量的减少并不影响REL的疗效但在NR中确实如此。降低Peginterferon剂量可降低所有组的SVR24发生率,尤其是在先前的NR中。 ILF增加导致SVR24的致命并发症的风险增加。一种解决方案可能是为有治疗经验的患者(尤其是肝硬化患者)提供广泛,早期获得新颖,有效和安全的无干扰素联合治疗的途径。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号