首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula by Daviset al.
【2h】

The dorsal posterior insula is not an island in pain but subserves a fundamental role - Response to: Evidence against pain specificity in the dorsal posterior insula by Daviset al.

机译:背后岛绝不是疼痛中的孤岛而是起着根本作用-回应:戴维斯(Davis)的背后岛疼痛特异性证据等。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An interesting and valuable discussion has arisen from our recent article (Segerdahl, Mezue et al., 2015) and we are pleased here to have the opportunity to expand on the various points we made. Equally important, we wish to correct several important misunderstandings that were made by Davis and colleagues that possibly contributed to their concerns about power when assessing our paper (e.g. actual subject numbers used in control experiment and the reality of the signal-to-noise and sampling of the multi-TI technique we employed). Here, we clarify the methods and analysis plus discuss how we interpret the data in the Brief Communication noting that the extrapolation and inferences made by Davis and colleagues are not consistent with our report or necessarily, in our opinion, what the data supports. We trust this reassures the F1000Research readership regarding the robustness of our results and what we actually concluded in the paper regarding their possible meaning. We are pleased, though, that Davis and colleagues have used our article to raise an important discussion around pain perception, and here offer some further insights towards that broader discussion.
机译:我们最近的文章(Segerdahl,Mezue等人,2015)引起了有趣而有价值的讨论,我们很高兴在这里有机会扩展我们提出的各个观点。同样重要的是,我们希望纠正戴维斯及其同事所做的一些重要误解,这些误解可能会导致他们在评估本文时对功耗的担忧(例如,控制实验中使用的实际主题编号以及信噪比和采样的现实性)我们采用的多TI技术)。在此,我们澄清方法和分析,并讨论我们如何在简报中解释数据,并指出戴维斯及其同事所做的推断和推论与我们的报告不一致,或者在我们看来不一定与数据支持相符。我们相信这可以确保F1000Research读者对我们结果的可靠性以及我们在本文中实际得出的关于其可能含义的结论感到放心。不过,我们很高兴,戴维斯(Davis)及其同事利用我们的文章引发了关于疼痛感知的重要讨论,并且在此为更广泛的讨论提供了一些进一步的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号