首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A predictive screening tool to detect diabetic retinopathy or macular edema in primary health care: construction validation and implementation on a mobile application
【2h】

A predictive screening tool to detect diabetic retinopathy or macular edema in primary health care: construction validation and implementation on a mobile application

机译:一种在初级卫生保健中检测糖尿病性视网膜病变或黄斑水肿的预测性筛查工具:移动应用程序的构建验证和实施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The most described techniques used to detect diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema have to be interpreted correctly, such that a person not specialized in ophthalmology, as is usually the case of a primary care physician, may experience difficulties with their interpretation; therefore we constructed, validated and implemented as a mobile app a new tool to detect diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema (DRDME) using simple objective variables. We undertook a cross-sectional, observational study of a sample of 142 eyes from Spanish diabetic patients suspected of having DRDME in 2012–2013. Our outcome was DRDME and the secondary variables were: type of diabetes, gender, age, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), foveal thickness and visual acuity (best corrected). The sample was divided into two parts: 80% to construct the tool and 20% to validate it. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict DRDME. The resulting model was transformed into a scoring system. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and risk groups established. The tool was validated by calculating the AUC and comparing expected events with observed events. The construction sample (n = 106) had 35 DRDME (95% CI [24.1–42.0]), and the validation sample (n = 36) had 12 DRDME (95% CI [17.9–48.7]). Factors associated with DRDME were: HbA1c (per 1%) (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [0.93–1.98], p = 0.113), foveal thickness (per 1 µm) (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [1.01–1.04], p < 0.001) and visual acuity (per unit) (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.00–0.16], p < 0.001). AUC for the validation: 0.90 (95% CI [0.75–1.00], p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the expected and the observed outcomes (p = 0.422). In conclusion, we constructed and validated a simple rapid tool to determine whether a diabetic patient suspected of having DRDME really has it. This tool has been implemented on a mobile app. Further validation studies are required in the general diabetic population.
机译:必须正确解释用于检测糖尿病性视网膜病变和糖尿病性黄斑水肿的最先进技术,以使不擅长眼科的人员(通常是基层医疗医生)在解释时会遇到困难;因此,我们构造,验证并实现了一个移动应用程序,该工具使用简单的目标变量来检测糖尿病性视网膜病变或糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DRDME)。我们对2012-2013年间怀疑患有DRDME的西班牙糖尿病患者的142眼样本进行了横断面观察研究。我们的结果是DRDME,其次要变量是:糖尿病类型,性别,年龄,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),中央凹厚度和视力(最佳矫正)。样本分为两个部分:80%用于构建工具,20%用于验证工具。二元逻辑回归模型用于预测DRDME。生成的模型被转换为评分系统。计算ROC曲线下的面积(AUC)并建立风险组。通过计算AUC并将预期事件与观察到的事件进行比较来验证该工具。建筑样本(n = 106)具有35 DRDME(95%CI [24.1-42.0]),而验证样本(n = 36)具有12 DRDME(95%CI [17.9-48.7])。与DRDME相关的因素有:HbA1c(每1%)(OR = 1.36,95%CI [0.93-1.98],p = 0.113),中央凹厚度(每1 µm)(OR = 1.03,95%CI [1.01-1.04] ],p <0.001)和视敏度(每单位)(OR = 0.14,95%CI [0.00-0.16],p <0.001)。验证的AUC:0.90(95%CI [0.75-1.00],p <0.001)。在预期结果和观察到的结果之间未发现显着差异(p = 0.422)。总之,我们构建并验证了一个简单的快速工具,用于确定怀疑患有DRDME的糖尿病患者是否确实具有该工具。此工具已在移动应用程序上实现。一般糖尿病人群需要进一步的验证研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号