首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Revisiting the STEC Testing Approach: Using espK and espV to Make Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) Detection More Reliable in Beef
【2h】

Revisiting the STEC Testing Approach: Using espK and espV to Make Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) Detection More Reliable in Beef

机译:重新审视STEC测试方法:使用espK和espV使牛肉中的肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)检测更加可靠

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current methods for screening Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157 and non-O157 in beef enrichments typically rely on the molecular detection of stx, eae, and serogroup-specific wzx or wzy gene fragments. As these genetic markers can also be found in some non-EHEC strains, a number of “false positive” results are obtained. Here, we explore the suitability of five novel molecular markers, espK, espV, ureD, Z2098, and CRISPRO26:H11 as candidates for a more accurate screening of EHEC strains of greater clinical significance in industrialized countries. Of the 1739 beef enrichments tested, 180 were positive for both stx and eae genes. Ninety (50%) of these tested negative for espK, espV, ureD, and Z2098, but 12 out of these negative samples were positive for the CRISPRO26:H11 gene marker specific for a newly emerging virulent EHEC O26:H11 French clone. We show that screening for stx, eae, espK, and espV, in association with the CRISPRO26:H11 marker is a better approach to narrow down the EHEC screening step in beef enrichments. The number of potentially positive samples was reduced by 48.88% by means of this alternative strategy compared to the European and American reference methods, thus substantially improving the discriminatory power of EHEC screening systems. This approach is in line with the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) opinion on pathogenic STEC published in 2013.
机译:当前在牛肉浓缩物中筛选肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)O157和非O157的方法通常依赖于stx,eae和血清群特异性wzx或wzy基因片段的分子检测。由于在一些非EHEC菌株中也可以找到这些遗传标记,因此获得了许多“假阳性”结果。在这里,我们探讨了五种新型分子标记物espK,espV,ureD,Z2098和CRISPRO26:H11的适用性,这些候选物可用于在工业化国家中更准确地筛选具有更大临床意义的EHEC菌株。在测试的1739份牛肉浓缩物中,有180份stx和eae基因均为阳性。其中有90%(50%)的espK,espV,ureD和Z2098呈阴性,但其中12个呈阴性的CRISPRO26:H11基因标记对阳性的法国EHEC O26:H11新型有毒力克隆呈阳性。我们显示与CRISPRO26:H11标记结合对stx,eae,espK和espV进行筛选是缩小牛肉浓缩中EHEC筛选步骤的更好方法。与欧洲和美国的参考方法相比,通过这种替代策略,潜在阳性样品的数量减少了48.88%,从而大大提高了EHEC筛选系统的歧视能力。这种方法符合EFSA(欧洲食品安全局)于2013年发布的关于病原STEC的意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号