首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Box-Counting Dimension Revisited: Presenting an Efficient Method of Minimizing Quantization Error and an Assessment of the Self-Similarity of Structural Root Systems
【2h】

Box-Counting Dimension Revisited: Presenting an Efficient Method of Minimizing Quantization Error and an Assessment of the Self-Similarity of Structural Root Systems

机译:再次讨论盒计数维:提出一种最小化量化误差的有效方法并评估结构根系统的自相似性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fractal dimension (FD), estimated by box-counting, is a metric used to characterize plant anatomical complexity or space-filling characteristic for a variety of purposes. The vast majority of published studies fail to evaluate the assumption of statistical self-similarity, which underpins the validity of the procedure. The box-counting procedure is also subject to error arising from arbitrary grid placement, known as quantization error (QE), which is strictly positive and varies as a function of scale, making it problematic for the procedure's slope estimation step. Previous studies either ignore QE or employ inefficient brute-force grid translations to reduce it. The goals of this study were to characterize the effect of QE due to translation and rotation on FD estimates, to provide an efficient method of reducing QE, and to evaluate the assumption of statistical self-similarity of coarse root datasets typical of those used in recent trait studies. Coarse root systems of 36 shrubs were digitized in 3D and subjected to box-counts. A pattern search algorithm was used to minimize QE by optimizing grid placement and its efficiency was compared to the brute force method. The degree of statistical self-similarity was evaluated using linear regression residuals and local slope estimates. QE, due to both grid position and orientation, was a significant source of error in FD estimates, but pattern search provided an efficient means of minimizing it. Pattern search had higher initial computational cost but converged on lower error values more efficiently than the commonly employed brute force method. Our representations of coarse root system digitizations did not exhibit details over a sufficient range of scales to be considered statistically self-similar and informatively approximated as fractals, suggesting a lack of sufficient ramification of the coarse root systems for reiteration to be thought of as a dominant force in their development. FD estimates did not characterize the scaling of our digitizations well: the scaling exponent was a function of scale. Our findings serve as a caution against applying FD under the assumption of statistical self-similarity without rigorously evaluating it first.
机译:分形维数(FD)是通过盒计数来估计的,是用于表征植物解剖复杂性或用于多种目的的空间填充特征的度量。绝大多数已发表的研究未能评估统计自相似性的假设,这支撑了该过程的有效性。计票程序还会受到由于任意网格放置而引起的误差的影响,称为量化误差(QE),该误差严格为正值,并随比例变化而变化,这对于该程序的斜率估计步骤来说是有问题的。先前的研究要么忽略了量化宽松,要么采用效率低下的蛮力网格转换来减少量化宽松。这项研究的目的是表征因平移和旋转而导致的量化宽松对FD估计的影响,提供降低量化宽松的有效方法,并评估在最近使用的典型粗糙数据集的统计自相似性的假设。特征研究。对36个灌木的粗根系统进行3D数字化处理,然后进行盒计数。使用模式搜索算法通过优化网格放置来最小化QE,并将其效率与蛮力方法进行了比较。使用线性回归残差和局部斜率估计来评估统计自相似程度。由于网格位置和方向的原因,QE是FD估计中错误的重要来源,但是模式搜索提供了一种将其最小化的有效方法。模式搜索具有较高的初始计算成本,但比常用的蛮力方法更有效地收敛于较低的误差值。我们对粗根系统数字化的表示在足够范围的尺度上没有显示出任何细节,这些尺度被认为在统计上是自相似的,并且在信息上被近似地表示为分形,这表明粗根系统缺乏足够的分枝,以便被认为是占主导地位的重申他们发展的力量。 FD估计不能很好地描述我们数字化的比例:比例指数是比例的函数。我们的发现为避免在没有统计性自相似性假设的情况下应用FD提出警告,而无需先对其进行严格评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号