首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively
【2h】

But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively

机译:但是我很确定!元认知判断的准确性远低于回顾性判断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prospective and retrospective metacognitive judgments have been studied extensively in the field of memory; however, their accuracy has not been systematically compared. Such a comparison is important for studying how metacognitive judgments are formed. Here, we present the results of an experiment aiming to investigate the relation between performance in an anagram task and the accuracy of prospective and retrospective confidence judgments. Participants worked on anagrams and were then asked to respond whether a presented word was the solution. They also rated their confidence, either before or after the response and either before or after seeing the suggested solution. The results showed that although response accuracy always correlated with confidence, this relationship was weaker when metacognitive judgements were given before the response. We discuss the theoretical and methodological implications of this finding for studies on metacognition and consciousness.
机译:前瞻性和回顾性元认知判断已在记忆领域得到了广泛的研究。但是,它们的准确性尚未得到系统地比较。这样的比较对于研究元认知判断的形成方式非常重要。在这里,我们提出一个实验的结果,旨在研究在一个字谜任务中的表现与前瞻性和回顾性置信度判断的准确性之间的关系。参与者研究了字谜,然后被要求回答提出的单词是否是解决方案。他们还在回答之前或之后以及在看到建议的解决方案之前或之后对自己的信心进行了评分。结果表明,尽管反应准确度始终与置信度相关,但是当在反应之前做出元认知判断时,这种关系较弱。我们讨论了这一发现对元认知和意识研究的理论和方法论意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号