首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Measuring Elemental Time and Duty Cycle Using Automated Video Processing
【2h】

Measuring Elemental Time and Duty Cycle Using Automated Video Processing

机译:使用自动视频处理测量基本时间和占空比

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A marker-less 2D video algorithm measured hand kinematics (location, velocity, and acceleration) in a paced repetitive laboratory task for varying hand activity levels (HAL). The decision tree (DT) algorithm identified the trajectory of the hand using spatiotemporal relationships during the exertion and rest states. The feature vector training (FVT) method utilized the k-nearest neighborhood classifier, trained using a set of samples or the first cycle. The average duty cycle error using the DT algorithm was 2.7%. The FVT algorithm had an average 3.3% error when trained using the first cycle sample of each repetitive task, and had a 2.8% average error when trained using several representative repetitive cycles. Error for HAL was 0.1 for both algorithms, which was considered negligible. Elemental time, stratified by task and subject, were not statistically different from ground truth (p < .05). Both algorithms performed well for automatically measuring elapsed time, duty cycle and HAL.
机译:一种无标记的2D视频算法,可以在有节奏的重复实验室任务中针对不同的手部活动水平(HAL)测量手部运动学(位置,速度和加速度)。决策树(DT)算法使用运动状态和休息状态期间的时空关系来识别手的轨迹。特征向量训练(FVT)方法利用了k最近邻分类器,使用一组样本或第一个周期对其进行了训练。使用DT算法的平均占空比误差为2.7%。当使用每个重复性任务的第一个周期样本进行训练时,FVT算法的平均误差为3.3%,而使用多个有代表性的重复性循环进行训练时,FVT算法的平均误差为2.8%。两种算法的HAL误差均为0.1,这可以忽略不计。按任务和主题分层的基本时间与地面实况在统计学上没有差异(p <.05)。两种算法在自动测量经过时间,占空比和HAL方面均表现出色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号