首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and ADHD-Inattention as Predictors of Externalizing Internalizing and Impairment: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study
【2h】

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and ADHD-Inattention as Predictors of Externalizing Internalizing and Impairment: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study

机译:迟钝的认知节奏和注意力缺陷多动症的注意力是外在内在和障碍的预测因素:一项为期两年的纵向研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), few studies have examined whether SCT longitudinally predicts psychopathology or impairment. This study examined (1) whether cross-sectional correlates of SCT and ADHD-inattention (IN) from an earlier study with first and second grade children in Spain would replicate with ratings by new teachers and aides when the children are in third grade, and (2) whether SCT and ADHD-IN symptoms assessed in first and second grade uniquely predicted psychopathology as well as academic and social impairment in third grade. The study included 758 first grade (55% boys), 718 second grade (54% boys), and 567 third grade (54% boys) children. Cross-sectional results for third grade children replicated and extended earlier results, with higher levels of SCT uniquely predicting lower levels of hyperactivity-impulsivity (HI) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and higher levels of anxiety, depression, academic impairment, and peer rejection (for teachers only) whereas higher levels of ADHD-IN uniquely predicted poorer outcomes across all domains except anxiety. For one- and two-year intervals across different teachers and aides, higher scores on ADHD-IN uniquely predicted poorer outcomes across domains whereas higher scores on SCT uniquely predicted lower levels of ADHD-HI and ODD for both intervals in addition to higher levels of depression (for teachers only) and academic impairment (for one-year interval only). Overall, SCT was significantly associated with important outcomes independent of ADHD-IN, even over one- and two-year intervals with different raters. This study provides further evidence for distinguishing between SCT and ADHD-IN in school settings.
机译:尽管迟钝的认知节奏(SCT)与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)不同,但很少有研究检查SCT是纵向预测心理病理还是损伤。这项研究调查了(1)来自西班牙一,二年级儿童的较早研究中,SCT和ADHD注意力不足(IN)的横断面相关性是否会在儿童为三年级时与新教师和助手的评分相同,并且(2)在一年级和二年级评估的SCT和ADHD-IN症状是否可以唯一预测心理病理学以及三年级的学术和社会障碍。该研究包括758个一年级(男生占55%),718个第二级(男生占54%)和567个三年级(男生占54%)。三年级儿童的横断面结果重复并扩展了较早的结果,较高的SCT可以预测较低水平的多动冲动(HI)和对立反抗障碍(ODD)症状,以及较高水平的焦虑,抑郁,学习障碍和同伴排斥(仅针对教师),而较高水平的ADHD-IN可以唯一预测除焦虑以外所有领域的预后较差。对于不同教师和助手的一年和两年的时间间隔,ADHD-IN的较高得分可以唯一预测跨域的较差结果,而SCT的较高得分可以预测较高的ADHD-HI和ODD的水平均较低抑郁症(仅针对教师)和学业障碍(仅针对一年间隔)。总体而言,SCT与独立于ADHD-IN的重要结局显着相关,即使在不同评级者的情况下,间隔一年和两年也是如此。这项研究为区分学校环境中的SCT和ADHD-IN提供了进一步的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号