首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Crowdsourcing Vector Surveillance: Using Community Knowledge and Experiences to Predict Densities and Distribution of Outdoor-Biting Mosquitoes in Rural Tanzania
【2h】

Crowdsourcing Vector Surveillance: Using Community Knowledge and Experiences to Predict Densities and Distribution of Outdoor-Biting Mosquitoes in Rural Tanzania

机译:众包媒介监测:利用社区知识和经验来预测坦桑尼亚农村地区户外咬蚊的密度和分布

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Lack of reliable techniques for large-scale monitoring of disease-transmitting mosquitoes is a major public health challenge, especially where advanced geo-information systems are not regularly applicable. We tested an innovative crowd-sourcing approach, which relies simply on knowledge and experiences of residents to rapidly predict areas where disease-transmitting mosquitoes are most abundant. Guided by community-based resource persons, we mapped boundaries and major physical features in three rural Tanzanian villages. We then selected 60 community members, taught them basic map-reading skills, and offered them gridded maps of their own villages (grid size: 200m×200m) so they could identify locations where they believed mosquitoes were most abundant, by ranking the grids from one (highest density) to five (lowest density). The ranks were interpolated in ArcGIS-10 (ESRI-USA) using inverse distance weighting (IDW) method, and re-classified to depict areas people believed had high, medium and low mosquito densities. Finally, we used odor-baited mosquito traps to compare and verify actual outdoor mosquito densities in the same areas. We repeated this process for 12 months, each time with a different group of 60 residents. All entomological surveys depicted similar geographical stratification of mosquito densities in areas classified by community members as having high, medium and low vector abundance. These similarities were observed when all mosquito species were combined, and also when only malaria vectors were considered. Of the 12,412 mosquitoes caught, 60.9% (7,555) were from areas considered by community members as having high mosquito densities, 28% (3,470) from medium density areas, and 11.2% (1,387) from low density areas. This study provides evidence that we can rely on community knowledge and experiences to identify areas where mosquitoes are most abundant or least abundant, even without entomological surveys. This crowd-sourcing method could be further refined and validated to improve community-based planning of mosquito control operations at low-cost.
机译:缺乏大规模监测传播疾病的蚊子的可靠技术是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,尤其是在高级地理信息系统无法定期使用的情况下。我们测试了一种创新的人群采购方法,该方法仅依靠居民的知识和经验来快速预测传播疾病的蚊子最多的地区。在社区资源顾问的指导下,我们绘制了坦桑尼亚三个农村村庄的边界和主要自然特征。然后,我们选择了60个社区成员,教给他们基本的地图阅读技巧,并为他们提供了自己村庄的网格化地图(网格大小:200m×200m),以便他们通过对网格进行排名来确定他们认为蚊子最多的位置。 1(最高密度)到5(最低密度)。使用反距离权重(IDW)方法在ArcGIS-10(美国ESRI-美国)中对等级进行插值,并对等级进行重新分类以描绘人们认为蚊子密度高,中和低的区域。最后,我们使用了带有气味的诱蚊器来比较和验证同一地区的实际室外蚊子密度。我们将这个过程重复了12个月,每次都是由60名居民组成的另一个小组。所有昆虫学调查都描述了按社区成员分类为高,中和低病媒丰度的地区蚊子密度的相似地理分层。当所有蚊子种类合并在一起时,以及仅考虑疟疾媒介时,都观察到了这些相似性。在捕获的12,412只蚊子中,有60.9%(7,555)来自社区成员认为蚊子密度高的地区,有28%(3,470)来自中密度地区,有11.2%(1,387)来自低密度地区。这项研究提供的证据表明,即使没有进行昆虫调查,我们也可以依靠社区的知识和经验来确定蚊子最多或最少的地区。可以进一步完善和验证这种众包方法,以低成本改进基于社区的灭蚊行动计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号