首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community–Academic Research Partnerships
【2h】

Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community–Academic Research Partnerships

机译:利益相关者关于在社区-学术研究合作伙伴关系中建立和维护信任的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Community–academic research partnerships aim to build stakeholder trust in order to improve the reach and translation of health research, but there is limited empirical research regarding effective ways to build trust. This multisite study was launched to identify similarities and differences among stakeholders’ perspectives of antecedents to trust in research partnerships. In 2013–2014, we conducted a mixed-methods concept mapping study with participants from three major stakeholder groups who identified and rated the importance of different antecedents of trust on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Study participants were community members (n = 66), health care providers (n = 38), and academic researchers (n = 44). All stakeholder groups rated “authentic communication” and “reciprocal relationships” the highest in importance. Community members rated “communication/methodology to resolve problems” (M = 4.23, SD = 0.58) significantly higher than academic researchers (M = 3.87, SD = 0.67) and health care providers (M = 3.89, SD = 0.62; p < .01) and had different perspectives regarding the importance of issues related to “sustainability.” The importance of communication and relationships across stakeholders indicates the importance of colearning processes that involve the exchange of knowledge and skills. The differences uncovered suggest specific areas where attention and skill building may be needed to improve trust within partnerships. More research on how partnerships can improve communication specific to problem solving and sustainability is merited.
机译:社区与学术界的研究伙伴关系旨在建立利益相关者的信任,以提高卫生研究的覆盖面和转化率,但是关于建立信任的有效方法的实证研究有限。开展这项多站点研究的目的是确定利益相关者对信任研究合作伙伴关系的先辈观点的异同。在2013–2014年,我们与来自三个主要利益相关者群体的参与者进行了混合方法概念图研究,他们以5点Likert型量表确定并评估了不同信任前提的重要性。研究参与者为社区成员(n = 66),卫生保健提供者(n = 38)和学术研究人员(n = 44)。所有利益相关者团体都将“真实沟通”和“互惠关系”评为最高重要性。社区成员对“解决问题的沟通/方法论”(M = 4.23,SD = 0.58)的评分显着高于学术研究人员(M = 3.87,SD = 0.67)和卫生保健提供者(M = 3.89,SD = 0.62; p <。 01),并且对与“可持续性”相关的问题的重要性持有不同的看法。利益相关者之间的沟通和关系的重要性表明了涉及知识和技能交流的协作过程的重要性。发现的差异表明可能需要关注和技能建设的特定领域,以增进伙伴关系之间的信任。值得开展更多有关伙伴关系如何改善特定于问题解决和可持续性的沟通的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号