首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Disparities in access to preventive health care services among insured children in a cross sectional study
【2h】

Disparities in access to preventive health care services among insured children in a cross sectional study

机译:在一项横断面研究中被保险儿童获得预防保健服务的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Children with insurance have better access to care and health outcomes if their parents also have insurance. However, little is known about whether the type of parental insurance matters. This study attempts to determine whether the type of parental insurance affects the access to health care services of children.I used data from the 2009–2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and estimated multivariate logistic regressions (N = 26,152). I estimated how family insurance coverage affects the probability that children have a usual source of care, well-child visits in the past year, unmet medical and prescription needs, less than 1 dental visit per year, and unmet dental needs.Children in families with mixed insurance (child publicly insured and parent privately insured) were less likely to have a well-child visit than children in privately insured families (odds ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98). When restricting the sample to publicly insured children, children with privately insured parents were less likely to have a well-child visit (odds ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.73–0.92), less likely to have a usual source of care (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.94), and more likely to have unmet dental needs (odds ratio = 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.58).Children in families with mixed insurance tend to fare poorly compared to children in publicly insured families. This may indicate that children in these families may be underinsured. Expanding parental eligibility for public insurance or subsidizing private insurance for children would potentially improve their access to preventive care.
机译:如果父母也有保险,则有保险的孩子可以更好地获得护理和健康结果。但是,对于父母保险的类型是否重要还知之甚少。这项研究试图确定父母保险的类型是否会影响儿童获得医疗保健服务的机会。我使用了2009-2013年医疗支出小组调查的数据并估计了多元logistic回归(N = 26,152)。我估计了家庭保险的覆盖范围如何影响儿童获得常规护理,在过去一年中孩子就诊,未满足医疗和处方需求,每年少于1次牙科就诊以及未满足牙科需求的可能性。与私人保险家庭的孩子相比,混合保险(儿童公共保险和父母私人保险)的孩子访视的可能性较小(赔率= 0.86,95%置信区间0.76-0.98)。当将样本限制为有公共保险的孩子时,有私人保险的父母的孩子进行良好孩子访视的可能性较小(赔率= 0.82,95%的置信区间为0.73-0.92),也不太可能拥有常规的护理来源(赔率比率= 0.79,95%的置信区间0.67–0.94),并且更可能满足未满足的牙科需求(赔率= 1.68,95%的置信区间1.10–2.58)。公共保险家庭。这可能表明这些家庭中的孩子的保险不足。扩大父母参加公共保险的资格或为儿童补贴私人保险将有可能改善他们获得预防保健的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号