首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Reward and Relief Dimensions of Temptation to Drink: Construct Validity and Role in Predicting Differential Benefit from Acamprosate and Naltrexone
【2h】

Reward and Relief Dimensions of Temptation to Drink: Construct Validity and Role in Predicting Differential Benefit from Acamprosate and Naltrexone

机译:诱惑饮酒的奖励和救济维度:构造有效性和预测阿坎酸和纳曲酮差异收益的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Researchers have sought to distinguish between individuals whose alcohol use disorder (AUD) is maintained by drinking to relieve negative affect (“relief drinkers”) and those whose AUD is maintained by the rewarding effects of alcohol (“reward drinkers”). As an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone may be particularly effective for reward drinkers. Acamprosate, which has been shown to down-regulate the glutamatergic system, may be particularly effective for relief drinkers. This study sought to replicate and extend prior work (PREDICT study; ) by examining dimensions of reward and relief temptation to drink and subtypes of individuals with distinct patterns of reward/relief temptation. We utilized data from two randomized clinical trials for AUD (Project MATCH, n=1726 and COMBINE study, n=1383). We also tested whether classes of reward/relief temptation would predict differential response to naltrexone and acamprosate in COMBINE. Results replicated prior work by identifying reward and relief temptation factors, which had excellent reliability and construct validity. Using factor mixture modeling, we identified 5 distinct classes of reward/relief temptation that replicated across studies. In COMBINE, we found a significant class-by-acamprosate interaction effect. Among those most likely classified in the high relief/moderate reward temptation class, individuals had better drinking outcomes if assigned to acamprosate versus placebo. We did not find a significant class-by-naltrexone interaction effect. Our study questions the orthogonal classification of drinkers into only two types (reward or relief drinkers) and adds to the body of research on moderators of acamprosate, which may inform clinical decision making in the treatment of AUD.
机译:研究人员试图区分通过饮酒缓解不良影响而维持酒精使用障碍(AUD)的人(“缓解饮酒者”)与通过酒精的奖励作用维持AUD的人(“奖励饮酒者”)。作为阿片样物质受体拮抗剂,纳曲酮对于奖励饮酒者可能特别有效。阿坎酸已被证明能下调谷氨酸能系统,对戒酒者可能特别有效。本研究试图通过研究对饮料的奖励和救济诱惑的维度以及具有不同奖励/救济诱惑模式的个体的亚型,来复制和扩展先前的工作(PREDICT研究;)。我们利用了两项针对AUD的随机临床试验的数据(Project MATCH,n = 1726和COMBINE研究,n = 1383)。我们还测试了奖励/缓解诱惑的类别是否可以预测对COMBINE中纳曲酮和阿坎酸的差异反应。结果通过确定奖励和救济的诱惑因素来复制以前的工作,这些因素具有出色的可靠性和构造效度。使用因子混合模型,我们确定了在研究中重复出现的5种不同类别的奖励/救济诱惑。在COMBINE中,我们发现了一个显着的逐类别交互作用。在那些最有可能归类为高救济/中度奖励诱惑类别的人中,如果将其分配给阿坎酸和安慰剂,个体的饮酒效果会更好。我们没有发现明显的按纳曲酮类相互作用。我们的研究质疑饮酒者的正交分类仅分为两种类型(奖励或缓解饮酒者),并增加了阿坎酸缓和剂的研究范围,这可能会为澳元治疗提供临床决策依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号