首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparative assessment of therapeutic safety of norcantharidin N-farnesyloxy-norcantharimide and N-farnesyl-norcantharimide against Jurkat T cells relative to human normal lymphoblast
【2h】

Comparative assessment of therapeutic safety of norcantharidin N-farnesyloxy-norcantharimide and N-farnesyl-norcantharimide against Jurkat T cells relative to human normal lymphoblast

机译:相对于正常人淋巴母细胞降冰素抑制素N-法尼基氧基-降冰片胺和N-法尼基-去甲酰胺对Jurkat T细胞的治疗安全性比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The therapeutic safety of an anticancer drug is one of the most important concerns of the physician treating the cancer patient. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and hillslope are usually used to represent the strength and sensitivity of an anticancer drug on cancer cells. The therapeutic safety of the anticancer drug can be assessed by comparing the IC50 and hillslope of anticancer drugs on cancer cells relative to normal cells. Since there are situations where “more anticancer activity” implies “more toxicity,” the safety of an anticancer drug in these situations is hard to evaluate by using IC50 and hillslope alone. In a previous study, the “net effect” index was devised to represent the net therapeutic effects of one anticancer drug relative to the other. However, the therapeutic safety of one specific anticancer drug alone was not defined in the “net effect” index. This study introduced the “safety index (SI)” to quantify the degree of safety of an anticancer drug by using 4-parameter logistic model on cancer cells relative to normal cells. The therapeutic safety of norcantharidin (NCTD), N-farnesyloxy-norcantharimide (NOC15), and N-farnesyl-norcantharimide (NC15) in the treatment of Jurkat T cells relative to human normal lymphoblast was compared using the newly defined SI. We found that the SI of NOC15 and NC15 was significantly higher than that of NCTD, suggesting that both NOC15 and NC15 can damage more cancer cells and less normal cells than NCTD. We conclude that both NOC15 and NC15 are safer anticancer drugs than NCTD in the treatment of Jurkat T cells relative to human normal lymphoblast. The SI can be further applied to the screening, developments, and applications of anticancer drugs in the future.
机译:抗癌药的治疗安全性是治疗癌症患者的医生最重要的关注之一。通常使用半数最大抑制浓度(IC50)和山坡表示抗癌药对癌细胞的强度和敏感性。抗癌药的治疗安全性可以通过比较抗癌药相对于正常细胞对癌细胞的IC50和斜率来评估。由于在某些情况下“更多的抗癌活性”意味着“更多的毒性”,因此仅使用IC50和Hillslope很难评估在这些情况下抗癌药物的安全性。在先前的研究中,“净效应”指数被设计为代表一种抗癌药相对于另一种抗癌药的净治疗作用。但是,单独的一种抗癌药物的治疗安全性并未在“净效应”指数中定义。这项研究引入了“安全指数(SI)”,通过使用相对于正常细胞的癌细胞的4参数逻辑模型来量化抗癌药物的安全程度。使用新定义的SI,比较了降冰素抑制素(NCTD),N-法呢烷氧基-降冰片嘧啶(NOC15)和N-法呢基-去甲胺化胺(NC15)在Jurkat T细胞治疗中相对于人类正常淋巴母细胞的治疗安全性。我们发现NOC15和NC15的SI显着高于NCTD,这表明NOC15和NC15都比NCTD损伤更多的癌细胞和更少的正常细胞。我们得出的结论是,相对于人类正常淋巴母细胞,在Jurkat T细胞的治疗中,NOC15和NC15都是比NCTD更安全的抗癌药物。 SI可以在将来进一步应用于抗癌药物的筛选,开发和应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号