首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Visual acuity measured with luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise letter stimuli in young adults and adults above 50 years old
【2h】

Visual acuity measured with luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise letter stimuli in young adults and adults above 50 years old

机译:年轻人和50岁以上成年人使用亮度调制和对比度调制的噪声字母刺激测量的视敏度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The human visual system is sensitive in detecting objects that have different luminance level from their background, known as first-order or luminance-modulated (LM) stimuli. We are also able to detect objects that have the same mean luminance as their background, only differing in contrast (or other attributes). Such objects are known as second-order or contrast-modulated (CM), stimuli. CM stimuli are thought to be processed in higher visual areas compared to LM stimuli, and may be more susceptible to ageing. We compared visual acuities (VA) of five healthy older adults (54.0±1.83 years old) and five healthy younger adults (25.4±1.29 years old) with LM and CM letters under monocular and binocular viewing. For monocular viewing, age had no effect on VA [F(1, 8)= 2.50, p> 0.05]. However, there was a significant main effect of age on VA under binocular viewing [F(1, 8)= 5.67, p< 0.05].  Binocular VA with CM letters in younger adults was approximately two lines better than that in older adults. For LM, binocular summation ratios were similar for older (1.16±0.21) and younger (1.15±0.06) adults. For CM, younger adults had higher binocular summation ratio (1.39±0.08) compared to older adults (1.12±0.09). Binocular viewing improved VA with LM letters for both groups similarly. However, in older adults, binocular viewing did not improve VA with CM letters as much as in younger adults. This could reflect a decline of higher visual areas due to ageing process, most likely higher than V1, which may be missed if measured with luminance-based stimuli alone.
机译:人类的视觉系统在检测具有与其背景不同的亮度水平的物体(称为一阶或亮度调制(LM)刺激)时非常敏感。我们还能够检测到具有与背景相同的平均亮度的对象,只是对比度(或其他属性)不同。这样的物体被称为二阶或对比度调制(CM)刺激。与LM刺激相比,认为CM刺激在较高的视觉区域得到处理,并且可能更容易老化。我们在单眼和双眼观察下比较了具有LM和CM字母的五名健康的老年人(54.0±1.83岁)和五名健康的年轻人(25​​.4±1.29岁)的视敏度(VA)。对于单眼观察,年龄对VA无影响[F(1,8)= 2.50,p> 0.05]。然而,在双眼观察下,年龄对VA有显着的主要影响[F(1,8)= 5.67,p <0.05]。在年轻人中,带有CM字母的双目VA大约比老年人好两行。对于LM,老年人(1.16±0.21)和年轻人(1.15±0.06)的双眼总和比率相似。对于CM,与成年人(1.12±0.09)相比,年轻人具有更高的双眼总和率(1.39±0.08)。两组的双眼观察都改善了LM字母的VA。但是,在老年人中,双眼观察并不能像年轻人一样改善带有CM字母的VA。这可能反映出由于老化过程而导致的较高视觉区域的下降,最有可能高于V1,如果仅使用基于亮度的刺激来测量,则可能会忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号