首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Whatever Happened to Formal Methods for Security?
【2h】

Whatever Happened to Formal Methods for Security?

机译:发生什么正式的安全方法?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We asked 7 experts 7 questions to find out what has occurred recently in terms of applying formal methods (FM) to security-centric, cyber problems. We are continually reminded of the 1996 paper by Tony Hoare “How did Software Get So Reliable Without Proof?” []In that vein, how did we get so insecure with proof? Given daily press announcements concerning new malware, data breaches, and privacy loss, is FM still relevant or was it ever? Our experts answered with unique personal insights. We were curious as to whether this successful methodology in “safety-critical” has succeeded as well for today’s “build it, hack it, patch it” mindset. Our experts were John McLean (Naval Research Labs), Paul Black (National Institute of Standards and Technology), Karl Levitt (University of California at Davis), Joseph Williams (CloudEconomist.Com), Connie Heitmeyer (Naval Research Labs), Eugene Spafford (Purdue University), and Joseph Kiniry (Galois, Inc.). The questions and responses follow.
机译:我们问了7位专家7个问题,以找出将形式化方法(FM)应用于以安全为中心的网络问题方面最近发生的事情。我们不断想起Tony Hoare在1996年发表的论文“软件如何在没有证明的情况下变得如此可靠?” []以这种方式,我们如何得到如此不安全的证据?鉴于每日都有有关新恶意软件,数据泄露和隐私丢失的新闻发布,FM仍然有用吗?我们的专家提供了独特的个人见解。我们对这种成功的“安全关键”方法论是否对于今天的“构建,破解,修补”思维方式是否也成功感到好奇。我们的专家有John McLean(海军研究实验室),Paul Black(美国国家标准技术研究所),Karl Levitt(加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校),Joseph Williams(CloudEconomist.Com),Connie Heitmeyer(海军研究实验室),Eugene Spafford (普渡大学(Purdue University))和约瑟夫·基尼里(Joseph Kiniry)(Galois,Inc.)。问题和答案如下。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    J. Voas; K. Schaffer;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(49),8
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 70–79
  • 总页数 14
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号