首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Automaticity of phasic alertness: evidence for a three-component model of visual cueing
【2h】

Automaticity of phasic alertness: evidence for a three-component model of visual cueing

机译:阶段性警觉的自动性:视觉提示的三部分模型的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The automaticity of phasic alertness is investigated using the attention network test. Results show that the cueing effect from the alerting cue—double cue—is strongly enhanced by the task relevance of visual cues, as determined by the informativeness of the orienting cue—single cue—that is being mixed (80% vs. 50% valid in predicting where the target will appear). Counterintuitively, the cueing effect from the alerting cue can be negatively affected by its visibility, such that masking the cue from awareness can reveal a cueing effect that is otherwise absent when the cue is visible. Evidently, top-down influences—in the form of contextual relevance and cue awareness—can have opposite influences on the cueing effect by the alerting cue. These findings lead us to the view that a visual cue can engage three components of attention—orienting, alerting, and inhibition—to determine the behavioral cueing effect. We propose that phasic alertness, particularly in the form of specific response readiness, is regulated by both internal, top-down expectation and external, bottom-up stimulus properties. In contrast to some existing views, we advance the perspective that phasic alertness is strongly tied to temporal orienting, attentional capture, and spatial orienting. Finally, we discuss how translating attention research to clinical applications would benefit from an improved ability to measure attention. To this end, controlling the degree of intraindividual variability in the attentional components and improving the precision of the measurement tools may prove vital.
机译:使用注意网络测试研究了阶段性警报的自动化。结果表明,警示提示(双重提示)的提示效果通过视觉提示的任务相关性得到了显着增强,视觉提示的任务相关性由定向提示(单个提示)的信息性决定(混合有效(80%与50%)预测目标的出现位置)。与直觉相反,警报提示的提示效果可能会受到其可见性的负面影响,因此从提示中屏蔽提示可能会揭示提示效果,否则该提示效果将在可见时消失。显然,自上而下的影响(以上下文相关性和提示意识的形式)可能对警报提示的提示效果产生相反的影响。这些发现使我们认为,视觉提示可以吸引注意力的三个部分(定向,警报和抑制)来确定行为提示的效果。我们建议,阶段性警觉,尤其是以特定反应准备的形式,受内部,自上而下的期望和外部,自下而上的刺激属性的调节。与某些现有观点相反,我们提出了一种观点,即阶段性警觉性与时间取向,注意力捕获和空间取向紧密相关。最后,我们讨论了将注意力研究转化为临床应用如何从改善的注意力衡量能力中受益。为此,控制注意力成分的个体差异程度和提高测量工具的准确性可能至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号