首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >What Makes for the Most Intense Regrets? Comparing the Effects of Several Theoretical Predictors of Regret Intensity
【2h】

What Makes for the Most Intense Regrets? Comparing the Effects of Several Theoretical Predictors of Regret Intensity

机译:是什么让最强烈的遗憾?比较后悔强度的几个理论预测因素的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Several theories have been proposed to account for variation in the intensity of life regrets. Variables hypothesized to affect the intensity of regret include: whether the regretted decision was an action or an inaction, the degree to which the decision was justified, and the life domain of the regret. No previous study has compared the effects of these key predictors in a single model in order to identify which are most strongly associated with the intensity of life regret. In this study, respondents (N = 500) to a postal survey answered questions concerning the nature of their greatest life regret. A Bayesian regression analysis suggested that regret intensity was greater for—in order of importance—decisions that breached participants’ personal life rules, decisions in social life domains than non-social domains, and decisions that lacked an explicit justification. Although regrets of inaction were more frequent than regrets of action, regrets relating to actions were slightly more intense.
机译:已经提出了几种理论来解释后悔生活强度的变化。假设会影响后悔的程度的变量包括:后悔的决定是无为还是无为,决定合理化的程度以及后悔的生活领域。以前没有研究在单个模型中比较过这些关键预测因素的影响,以便确定哪些因素与生活后悔的强度最密切相关。在这项研究中,接受邮政调查的受访者(N = 500)回答了有关其最大的后悔生活的问题。贝叶斯回归分析表明,后悔的强度更大(按重要性排序),这些决策违反了参与者的个人生活规则,在社交生活领域的决策比在非社交领域的决策以及缺乏明确理由的决策更重要。尽管无所作为的后悔比行动的后悔更为频繁,但与行动有关的后悔却更为强烈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号