首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation Sometimes Contrast
【2h】

Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation Sometimes Contrast

机译:味觉强度判断中的语境效应:没有同化有时会形成对比

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Judgments of taste intensity often show contextual contrast but not assimilation, even though both effects of stimulus context appear in other sense modalities, such as hearing. Four experiments used a paradigm that shifts the stimulus context within a test session in order to seek evidence of assimilation in judgments of the taste intensity of sucrose and, for comparison, the loudness of 500-Hz tones. Experiment 1 found no assimilation in taste using three response scales, magnitude estimation, labeled magnitude, and visual analog, but did find evidence of contrast. Experiments 2 and 3 found no clear evidence of either assimilation or contrast in taste, but found consistent evidence of assimilation in loudness. Experiment 4 found no assimilation in loudness, however, when the intervals between successive stimuli increased from about 6 to 30 s in order to match the interval used with sucrose in Experiments 1–3. Taken together, these findings suggest that the assimilation found in intensity judgments in other sensory modalities may not appear in taste perception because of the slower rates presenting of taste stimuli.
机译:味觉强度的判断通常会显示上下文对比,而不是同化,即使刺激上下文的两种效果都以其他感知方式(例如听力)出现。四个实验使用了一个范式,该范式在一个测试会话中改变了刺激的语境,以便在对蔗糖的味觉强度(以及比较而言,500 Hz音调的响度)的判断中寻找同化的证据。实验1使用三种反应量表,幅度估计,标记幅度和视觉类似物未发现味道同化,但确实找到了对比证据。实验2和3没有明显的证据表明味道被同化或形成对比,但是找到了响度中被同化的一致证据。实验4发现响度没有同化,但是,连续刺激之间的间隔从大约6到30 s增加到与实验1-3中蔗糖使用的间隔相匹配时。综上所述,这些发现表明在其他感官方式的强度判断中发现的同化可能不会出现在味觉中,因为味觉刺激的出现速度较慢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号