首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Limestone and Silica Powder Replacements for Cement: Early-Age Performance
【2h】

Limestone and Silica Powder Replacements for Cement: Early-Age Performance

机译:水泥的石灰石和二氧化硅粉末替代品:早期性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Developing functional concrete mixtures with less ordinary portland cement (OPC) has been one of the key objectives of the 21st century sustainability movement. While the supplies of many alternatives to OPC (such as fly ash or slag) may be limited, those of limestone and silica powders produced by crushing rocks seem virtually endless. The present study examines the chemical and physical influences of these powders on the rheology, hydration, and setting of cement-based materials via experiments and three-dimensional microstructural modeling. It is shown that both limestone and silica particle surfaces are active templates (sites) for the nucleation and growth of cement hydration products, while the limestone itself is also somewhat soluble, leading to the formation of carboaluminate hydration products. Because the filler particles are incorporated as active members of the percolated backbone that constitutes initial setting of a cement-based system, replacements of up to 50 % of the OPC by either of these powders on a volumetric basis have minimal impact on the initial setting time, and even a paste with only 5 % OPC and 95 % limestone powder by volume achieves initial set within 24 h. While their influence on setting is similar, the limestone and silica powders produce pastes with quite different rheological properties, when substituted at the same volume level. When proceeding from setting to later age strength development, one must also consider the dilution of the system due to cement removal, along with the solubility/reactivity of the filler. However, for applications where controlled (prompt) setting is more critical than developing high strengths, such as mortar tile adhesives, grouts, and renderings, significant levels of these powder replacements for cement can serve as sustainable, functional alternatives to the oft-employed 100 % OPC products.
机译:用较少的普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)开发功能性混凝土混合物已成为21世纪可持续发展运动的主要目标之一。虽然OPC的许多替代品(例如粉煤灰或矿渣)的供应可能受到限制,但通过压碎岩石生产的石灰石和二氧化硅粉末的供应似乎是无穷无尽的。本研究通过实验和三维微观结构模型研究了这些粉末对水泥基材料的流变学,水化和凝固的化学和物理影响。结果表明,石灰石和二氧化硅颗粒表面都是水泥水化产物成核和生长的活性模板(部位),而石灰石本身也有些可溶,导致形成碳铝酸盐水合产物。由于填料颗粒是作为渗透性骨架的活性成分而掺入的,构成了水泥基体系的初始凝结,因此,以体积计,这些粉末中的任何一种都可替代高达50%的OPC,对初始凝结时间的影响最小,即使是仅含5%OPC和95%石灰石粉(按体积计)的糊剂,也能在24小时内达到初始凝固。当它们对凝结的影响相似时,当以相同的体积水平取代时,石灰石和硅石粉会产生具有完全不同的流变特性的糊剂。从凝结到后期强度发展时,还必须考虑由于去除了水泥而造成的体系稀释,以及填料的溶解度/反应性。但是,对于控制(即刻)固化比开发高强度更为关键的应用(例如砂浆瓷砖胶粘剂,灌浆和抹灰),这些水平的水泥粉替代品可作为替代常规100的可持续,功能性替代品%OPC产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号