首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effect of Medical Student Volunteering in a Student-Run Clinic on Specialty Choice for Residency
【2h】

The Effect of Medical Student Volunteering in a Student-Run Clinic on Specialty Choice for Residency

机译:学生自办诊所的医学生志愿服务对住院专业选择的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) are a recent popular addition to medical school education, and a subset of studies has looked at the influence of SRFC volunteering on the medical student’s career development. The majority of the research done in this area has focused on understanding if these SRFCs produce physicians who are more likely to practice medicine in underserved communities, caring for the uninsured. The remainder of the research has investigated if volunteering in an SRFC influences the specialty choice of medical school students. The results of these specialty choice studies give no definitive answer as to whether medical students chose primary or specialty care residencies as a result of their SRFC experience.Keeping Neighbors in Good Health through Service (KNIGHTS) is the SRFC of the University of Central Florida College of Medicine (UCF COM). Both primary and specialty care is offered at the clinic. It is the goal of this study to determine if volunteering in the KNIGHTS SRFC influences UCF COM medical students to choose primary care, thereby helping to meet the rising need for primary care physicians in the United States.Methods: A survey was distributed to first, second, and third-year medical students at the UCF COM to collect data on demographics, prior volunteering experience, and specialty choice for residency. Responses were then combined with records of volunteer hours from the KNIGHTS Clinic and analyzed for correlations. We analyzed the frequency and Pearson’s chi-squared values. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Our survey had a total response rate of 39.8%. We found that neither the act of becoming a KNIGHTS Clinic volunteer nor the hours volunteered at the KNIGHTS Clinic influenced the UCF COM student’s choice to enter a primary care specialty (p = NS). Additionally, prior volunteering/clinical experience or the gender of the medical school student did not influence a student’s choice to volunteer at the KNIGHTS Clinic.Discussion: Volunteering at KNIGHTS Clinic did not increase student choice to enter primary care, with students choosing other specialties at equal rates, probably due to the variety of specialties present at the KNIGHTS Clinic. This suggests that the volunteer attending physicians present at an SRFC may influence the choice of residency for students. It also suggests that SFRCs are not a viable tool to increase the number of primary care doctors in the United States.
机译:简介:学生开办的免费诊所(SRFC)是医学院教育中最近流行的一种补充,并且有一部分研究研究了SRFC志愿服务对医学院学生职业发展的影响。在该领域进行的大多数研究都集中在了解这些SRFC是否产生了更可能在服务欠缺的社区中行医,照顾未投保者的医生。其余的研究调查了SRFC中的志愿者是否会影响医学院学生的专业选择。这些专业选择研究的结果并未给出关于医学生是根据SRFC经验选择基层医疗还是专科医疗的最终答案。通过服务保持良好健康的邻居(KNIGHTS)是中央佛罗里达大学的SRFC医学(UCF COM)。诊所提供初级和专科护理。这项研究的目的是确定KNIGHTS SRFC中的志愿者是否会影响UCF COM医学生选择初级保健,从而帮助满足美国对初级保健医生不断增长的需求。 UCF COM的第二和第三年级的医学生将收集有关人口统计数据,先前的志愿服务经验以及居住专业的选择。然后将响应与来自KNIGHTS诊所的志愿者工作时间记录相结合,并进行相关性分析。我们分析了频率和皮尔森的卡方值。 P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:我们的调查总答复率为39.8%。我们发现,成为KNIGHTS诊所志愿者的行为或在KNIGHTS诊所志愿服务的时间都不会影响UCF COM学生进入初级保健专业的选择(p = NS)。此外,先前的志愿服务/临床经验或医学院学生的性别不会影响学生选择在KNIGHTS诊所进行志愿服务的讨论。比率相等,可能是由于KNIGHTS诊所的专科门诊多种多样。这表明,参加SRFC的自愿主治医师可能会影响学生对居住地的选择。它还表明,SFRC并不是增加美国初级保健医生人数的可行工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号