首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Exploring Nurses’ Preschool Teachers’ and Parents’ Perspectives on Information Sharing Using SDQ in a Swedish Setting – A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory
【2h】

Exploring Nurses’ Preschool Teachers’ and Parents’ Perspectives on Information Sharing Using SDQ in a Swedish Setting – A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory

机译:探索护士学前班老师和父母在瑞典环境中使用SDQ进行信息共享的观点–使用扎根理论进行的定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Evidence-based methods to identify behavioural problems among children are not regularly used within the Swedish Child healthcare. A new procedure was therefore introduced to assess children through parent- and preschool teacher reports using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study aims to explore nurses’, preschool teachers’ and parents’ perspectives of this new information sharing model. Using the grounded theory methodology, semi-structured interviews with nurses (n = 10) at child health clinics, preschool teachers (n = 13) and parents (n = 11) of 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children were collected and analysed between March 2014 and June 2014. The analysis was conducted using constant comparative method. The participants were sampled purposively within a larger trial in Sweden. Results indicate that all stakeholders shared a desire to have a complete picture of the child's health. The perceptions that explain why the stakeholders were in favour of the new procedure—the ‘causal conditions’ in a grounded theory model—included: (1) Nurses thought that visits after 18-months were unsatisfactory, (2) Preschool teachers wanted to identify children with difficulties and (3) Parents viewed preschool teachers as being qualified to assess children. However, all stakeholders had doubts as to whether there was a reliable way to assess children’s behaviour. Although nurses found the SDQ to be useful for their clinical evaluation, they noticed that not all parents chose to participate. Both teachers and parents acknowledged benefits of information sharing. However, the former had concerns about parental reactions to their assessments and the latter about how personal information was handled. The theoretical model developed describes that the causal conditions and current context of child healthcare in many respects endorse the introduction of information sharing. However, successful implementation requires considerable work to address barriers: the tension between normative thinking versus helping children with developmental problems for preschool teachers and dealing with privacy issues and inequity in participation for parents.
机译:瑞典儿童医疗保健部门不定期使用基于证据的方法来识别儿童的行为问题。因此,引入了一种新程序,以使用“长处和困难问卷”(SDQ)通过家长和学前老师的报告评估儿童。这项研究旨在探讨护士,学前班老师和父母对这种新信息共享模型的看法。使用扎根的理论方法,对儿童保健诊所的护士(n = 10),学龄前老师(n = 13)和父母(n = 11)的3岁,4岁和5岁儿童进行了半结构化访谈。收集并分析了2014年3月至2014年6月之间的数据。该分析采用恒定比较方法进行。在瑞典的一项大型试验中,有目的地对参与者进行了抽样。结果表明,所有利益相关者都希望对孩子的健康有完整的了解。可以解释为什么利益相关者赞成新程序(扎根理论模型中的“因果条件”)的看法包括:(1)护士认为18个月后的探视不能令人满意,(2)幼儿教师想确定有困难的孩子;(3)父母认为学龄前老师有资格评估孩子。但是,所有利益相关者都怀疑是否存在评估孩子行为的可靠方法。尽管护士发现SDQ对他们的临床评估很有用,但他们注意到并非所有的父母都选择参加。老师和家长都承认信息共享的好处。但是,前者担心父母对其评估的反应,而后者担心如何处理个人信息。建立的理论模型描述了儿童保健的因果条件和当前背景在许多方面都支持引入信息共享。但是,成功的实施需要大量工作来解决障碍:规范性思维与帮助学龄前老师帮助有发育问题的孩子以及处理隐私问题和父母参与不平等之间的张力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号