首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations
【2h】

Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations

机译:使用FDA喷嘴模型来说明计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟中的验证技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A “credible” computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model has the potential to provide a meaningful evaluation of safety in medical devices. One major challenge in establishing “model credibility” is to determine the required degree of similarity between the model and experimental results for the model to be considered sufficiently validated. This study proposes a “threshold-based” validation approach that provides a well-defined acceptance criteria, which is a function of how close the simulation and experimental results are to the safety threshold, for establishing the model validity. The validation criteria developed following the threshold approach is not only a function of Comparison Error, E (which is the difference between experiments and simulations) but also takes in to account the risk to patient safety because of E. The method is applicable for scenarios in which a safety threshold can be clearly defined (e.g., the viscous shear-stress threshold for hemolysis in blood contacting devices). The applicability of the new validation approach was tested on the FDA nozzle geometry. The context of use (COU) was to evaluate if the instantaneous viscous shear stress in the nozzle geometry at Reynolds numbers (Re) of 3500 and 6500 was below the commonly accepted threshold for hemolysis. The CFD results (“S”) of velocity and viscous shear stress were compared with inter-laboratory experimental measurements (“D”). The uncertainties in the CFD and experimental results due to input parameter uncertainties were quantified following the ASME V&V 20 standard. The CFD models for both Re = 3500 and 6500 could not be sufficiently validated by performing a direct comparison between CFD and experimental results using the Student’s t-test. However, following the threshold-based approach, a Student’s t-test comparing |S-D| and |Threshold-S| showed that relative to the threshold, the CFD and experimental datasets for Re = 3500 were statistically similar and the model could be considered sufficiently validated for the COU. However, for Re = 6500, at certain locations where the shear stress is close the hemolysis threshold, the CFD model could not be considered sufficiently validated for the COU. Our analysis showed that the model could be sufficiently validated either by reducing the uncertainties in experiments, simulations, and the threshold or by increasing the sample size for the experiments and simulations. The threshold approach can be applied to all types of computational models and provides an objective way of determining model credibility and for evaluating medical devices.
机译:“可信的”计算流体动力学(CFD)模型具有对医疗设备安全性进行有意义的评估的潜力。建立“模型可信度”的一个主要挑战是确定模型与实验结果之间的相似度,以使模型被充分验证。这项研究提出了一种“基于阈值”的验证方法,该方法提供了定义明确的验收标准,该标准取决于模拟和实验结果与安全阈值的接近程度,以建立模型的有效性。遵循阈值方法制定的验证标准不仅是比较误差E(这是实验和模拟之间的差异)的函数,而且还考虑了由于E而对患者安全的风险。该方法适用于以下情况:可以明确定义安全阈值(例如,血液接触设备中溶血的粘性剪切应力阈值)。在FDA喷嘴几何形状上测试了新验证方法的适用性。使用的上下文(COU)是用于评估雷诺数(Re)为3500和6500时喷嘴几何形状中的瞬时粘性剪切应力是否低于公认的溶血阈值。将速度和粘性剪切应力的CFD结果(“ S”)与实验室间实验测量值(“ D”)进行了比较。根据ASME V&V 20标准对CFD的不确定性和由于输入参数不确定性导致的实验结果进行了量化。通过使用学生t检验在CFD和实验结果之间进行直接比较,无法充分验证Re = 3500和6500的CFD模型。但是,按照基于阈值的方法,学生的t检验比较| S-D |和| Threshold-S |结果表明,相对于阈值,Re = 3500的CFD和实验数据集在统计上相似,并且可以认为该模型已针对COU进行了充分验证。但是,对于Re = 6500,在剪切应力接近溶血阈值的某些位置,不能认为CFD模型已针对COU进行了充分验证。我们的分析表明,可以通过减少实验,仿真和阈值中的不确定性或通过增加实验和仿真的样本量来充分验证模型。阈值方法可以应用于所有类型的计算模型,并提供确定模型可信度和评估医疗设备的客观方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号