首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The analyzation and clinical evaluation of ECLIA and CMIA in the detection of Treponema pallidum
【2h】

The analyzation and clinical evaluation of ECLIA and CMIA in the detection of Treponema pallidum

机译:ECLIA和CMIA在梅毒螺旋体检测中的分析与临床评价。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To evaluate the clinical application value of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer (ECLIA) and chemiluminescent magnetic microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) in the detection of Treponema pallidum (TP).A total of 1225 patients in Peking University Third Hospital was enrolled from June 2014 to October 2014. ECLIA and CMIA were applied to detect the serum anti-TP. The positive rate was analyzed. RIBA was taken as a golden standard to evaluate the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the accuracy of ECLIA and CMIA. A correlation analysis between 2 assays was conducted, and that between assay and RIBA. We also evaluate the clinical value of TPPA in the detection of T pallidum.The positive rate of CMIA and ECLIA is 10.63% and 9.89%, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference (P > .05). For CMIA, ECLIA, and TPPA, the sensitivity is 99.16%, 99.16%, and 99.16%, the specificity is 98.99%, 99.82%, and 100%, the positive predictive value is 91.47%, 98.33%, and 100%, the negative predictive value is 99.91%, 99.91%, and 99.91%, the coincidence rate is 99.01% (Kappa = 0.895), 99.75% (Kappa = 0.997), and 99.92% (Kappa = 0.998), respectively.The result shows high correlation between ECLIA and CMIA. Both have high sensitivity and specificity and can be used as screening tests for the diagnosis of T pallidum in common condition.
机译:为了评估电化学发光免疫分析仪(ECLIA)和化学发光磁性微粒免疫分析仪(CMIA)在检测梅毒螺旋体(TP)中的临床应用价值.2014年6月至2014年10月,北京大学第三医院共有1225例患者入选。应用ECLIA和CMIA检测血清抗TP。分析阳性率。 RIBA被认为是评估ECLIA和CMIA的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性的黄金标准。进行了两次测定之间的相关性分析,以及测定与RIBA之间的相关性。我们还评估了TPPA在检测梅毒T中的临床价值.CMIA和ECLIA的阳性率分别为10.63%和9.89%,无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。对于CMIA,ECLIA和TPPA,敏感性为99.16%,99.16%和99.16%,特异性为98.99%,99.82%和100%,阳性预测值为91.47%,98.33%和100%,负预测值分别为99.91%,99.91%和99.91%,重合率分别为99.01%(Kappa = 0.895),99.75%(Kappa = 0.997)和99.92%(Kappa = 0.998),结果显示出高度相关性在ECLIA和CMIA之间。两者均具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,可作为常见情况下诊断梅毒T的筛选试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号