首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics
【2h】

Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics

机译:基于塔拉形态的主题特定旋转轴不能改善胫腓距和距下关节运动学的预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Use of subject-specific axes of rotation may improve predictions generated by kinematic models, especially for joints with complex anatomy, such as the tibiotalar and subtalar joints of the ankle. The objective of this study was twofold. First, we compared the axes of rotation between generic and subject-specific ankle models for ten control subjects. Second, we quantified the accuracy of generic and subject-specific models for predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion during level walking using inverse kinematics. Here, tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics measured in vivo by dual-fluoroscopy served as the reference standard. The generic model was based on a cadaver study, while the subject-specific models were derived from each subject's talus reconstructed from computed tomography images. The subject-specific and generic axes of rotation were significantly different. The average angle between the modeled axes was 12.9°±4.3° and 24.4°±5.9° at the tibiotalar and subtalar joints, respectively. However, predictions from both models did not agree well with dynamic dual-fluoroscopy data, where errors ranged from 1.0° to 8.9° and 0.6° to 7.6° for the generic and subject-specific models, respectively. Our results suggest that methods that rely on talar morphology to define subject-specific axes may be inadequate for accurately predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics.
机译:使用特定于对象的旋转轴可能会改善运动学模型生成的预测,尤其是对于具有复杂解剖结构的关节,例如踝的胫距骨和距骨下关节。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,我们比较了十个对照受试者的通用踝关节模型和特定受试者踝关节模型之间的旋转轴。其次,我们使用逆运动学定量了在水平行走过程中预测胫距和距下关节运动的通用模型和特定于对象的模型的准确性。在此,通过双透视检查法在体内测量的胫距和距下关节运动学用作参考标准。通用模型基于尸体研究,而特定于对象的模型则来自从计算机断层扫描图像重建的每个对象的距骨。特定对象旋转轴和通用旋转轴明显不同。胫骨距骨和距骨下方关节的建模轴之间的平均角度分别为12.9°±4.3°和24.4°±5.9°。然而,两种模型的预测与动态双透视数据均不一致,动态和荧光透视数据的通用模型和特定对象模型的误差分别为1.0°至8.9°和0.6°至7.6°。我们的结果表明,依靠距骨形态来定义受试者特定轴的方法可能不足以准确预测胫距和距骨的关节运动学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号