首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions
【2h】

Value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

机译:放射状探针支气管内超声引导下经支气管活检和计算机断层摄影术引导经胸针穿刺术对周围性肺部病变的诊断价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (CT-TTNA) is a minimally invasive technique for sampling peripheral lung lesions. Radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (rEBUS-TBB) is an alternative. The present study analyzed and compared rEBUS-TBB and CT-TTNA in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL).Clinical data of 513 patients with PPL who underwent an rEBUS-TBB or CT-TTNA examination were analyzed retrospectively. The positive diagnostic rate, complication rate, and influencing factors of the 2 methods were compared.The positive diagnostic rate and complication rate were significantly higher in CT-TTNA than rEBUS-TBB (P = .001; P < .001, respectively). The rEBUS-TBB group showed a higher positive diagnostic rate in larger lesions (>2 cm) than in smaller (≤2 cm) (P = .012), and was lower in the lesions proximal to the chest wall than those distally located (P = .046); no significant difference was observed in the different pulmonary segments (P = .109). In the CT-TTNA group, the positive diagnostic rate in larger lesions did not differ significantly than the smaller lesions (P = .05); it differed significantly in different segments (P = .044). The incidence of pneumothorax was lower in lesions proximal to the chest wall than those located distally (P = .037). In the rEBUS-TBB group, the success rate of the exploration and biopsy of the lesions was 87.4%; the rate of exploration of larger lesions and with bronchial sign was higher than smaller lesions and without bronchial sign (P < .001; P < .001, respectively) while that of lesions close to the chest wall was lower than those distally located (P = .006).rEBUS-TBB and CT-TTNA are effective and safe in the diagnosis of PPL. The positive diagnostic rate of CT-TTNA is higher than rEBUS-TBB. The incidence of pneumothorax in CT-TTNA is higher than rEBUS-TBB. CT-TTNA is selected for smaller lesions close to the chest wall; rEBUS-TBB is used for lesions larger, distal from the chest wall or with a bronchial sign.
机译:计算机断层扫描引导的经胸针穿刺术(CT-TTNA)是一种微创技术,用于采样周围肺部病变。放射状支气管内超声引导的经支气管活检(rEBUS-TBB)是一种替代方法。本研究分析和比较了rEBUS-TBB和CT-TTNA在周围性肺部病变(PPL)的诊断中的作用。回顾性分析了513例接受了rEBUS-TBB或CT-TTNA检查的PPL患者的临床资料。比较了这两种方法的阳性诊断率,并发症发生率和影响因素.CT-TTNA的阳性诊断率和并发症发生率显着高于rEBUS-TBB(分别为P = 0.001,P <0.001)。 rEBUS-TBB组在较大的病灶(> 2 cm)中显示出的阳性诊断率高于在较小的病灶(≤2cm)中的阳性诊断率(P = .012),并且在胸壁近端的病灶中的阳性诊断率低于远端的( P = .046);在不同的肺段中没有观察到显着差异(P = .109)。在CT-TTNA组中,较大病变的阳性诊断率与较小病变无显着差异(P = .05);在不同的细分市场中差异很大(P = .044)。在胸壁近端病变中,气胸的发生率低于在远端(P = .037)。在rEBUS-TBB组中,病变的探查和活检成功率为87.4%;较大病变和有支气管体征的探查率高于较小病变和无支气管体征(分别为P <.001; P <.001),而靠近胸壁的病变的探查率低于远端的病变(P = .006).rEBUS-TBB和CT-TTNA对PPL的诊断是有效和安全的。 CT-TTNA的阳性诊断率高于rEBUS-TBB。 CT-TTNA中气胸的发生率高于rEBUS-TBB。 CT-TTNA用于靠近胸壁的较小病变; rEBUS-TBB用于较大的病变,远离胸壁或有支气管征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号