首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >I WILL SURVIVE A Construct Validation Study on the Measurement of Sustainable Employability Using Different Age Conceptualizations
【2h】

I WILL SURVIVE A Construct Validation Study on the Measurement of Sustainable Employability Using Different Age Conceptualizations

机译:我会生存:使用不同年龄概念的可持续就业能力测量的结构验证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Though the importance of sustainable employability throughout people's working life is undisputed, up till now only one attempt for a conceptual definition has been made (van der Klink et al., ). Following the suggestions to further refine and improve this definition recently put forward by Fleuren et al. (), we propose an approach to sustainable employability that is based on the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) framework, and incorporates three indicators: the ability, the motivation, and the opportunity to continue working, respectively. As sustainable employability is considered to be an important aspect of successful aging at work, this study used four different conceptualizations of aging at work to set up convergent and divergent validity of our operationalization of sustainable employability: calendar age, organizational age (job and organizational tenure), functional age (work ability), and life-span age (partner and children). We formulated several hypotheses that were tested by analyzing data from an online survey among 180 employees from Dutch public service organizations who filled out a questionnaire on different age concepts, and their ability, motivation, and opportunity to continue working. Multiple regression analyses were performed, and results showed that the four conceptualizations of aging were differently related to the three indicators of sustainable employability. Life-span age, in terms of having children, had the strongest negative relationship with the ability to continue working, organizational age (i.e., organizational tenure) had the strongest negative relationship with the motivation to continue working, and functional age had the strongest negative relationship with the opportunity to continue working. Moreover, functional age was significantly negatively related to the other two indicators of sustainable employability too, while life-span age appeared to enhance the ability and motivation to continue working (in terms of having children) and the perceived opportunity to continue working (in terms of having a partner). Calendar age was only important for the opportunity to continue working and appeared to have a negative association with this outcome variable. These results lend support to our proposed operationalization of sustainable employability by showing that the three indicators are differently related to different age conceptualizations thus expanding previous research on the conceptualization of sustainable employability.
机译:尽管在人们的整个工作生活中可持续就业能力的重要性是毋庸置疑的,但迄今为止,仅进行了一次概念定义的尝试(van der Klink等,)。遵循Fleuren等人最近提出的进一步完善和改进此定义的建议。 (),我们提出了一种基于能力-动机-机会(AMO)框架的可持续就业能力的方法,该方法包含三个指标:分别为继续工作的能力,动机和机会。由于可持续就业能力被认为是成功实现工作老化的重要方面,因此本研究使用了四种不同的工作老化概念来设定我们可持续就业能力运作的趋同和分歧有效性:日历年龄,组织年龄(工作和组织任期) ),功能年龄(工作能力)和寿命(伙伴和儿童)年龄。我们提出了几种假设,通过对来自荷兰公共服务组织的180名员工的在线调查数据进行分析,对这些假设进行了检验,这些员工填写了有关不同年龄概念及其能力,动力和继续工作机会的问卷。进行了多元回归分析,结果表明,老龄化的四个概念与可持续就业能力的三个指标不同。就育有子女而言,终生年龄与继续工作能力之间存在最强的消极关系,组织年龄(即组织任期)与继续工作的动机之间存在最强的消极关系,而功能性年龄则具有最强烈的消极关系关系与继续工作的机会。此外,功能年龄也与可持续就业能力的其他两个指标显着负相关,而寿命年龄似乎增强了继续工作的能力和动力(就生孩子而言)和感知的继续工作的机会(就术语而言)有伴侣)。日历年龄仅对继续工作的机会很重要,并且似乎与此结果变量负相关。这些结果通过显示三个指标与不同年龄的概念化有不同的联系,从而扩大了我们先前关于可持续性就业概念化的研究,从而为我们提议的可持续性就业能力的实施提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号