首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Challenges and Perspectives in Bridging In- and Outpatient Sectors: The Implementation of Two Alternative Models of Care and Their Effect on the Average Length of Stay
【2h】

Challenges and Perspectives in Bridging In- and Outpatient Sectors: The Implementation of Two Alternative Models of Care and Their Effect on the Average Length of Stay

机译:桥接门诊和门诊部门的挑战和前景:两种替代治疗模式的实施及其对平均住院时间的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New models of care aimed at reinforcing the outpatient sector have been introduced in Germany over the last few years. Initially, a subscription-based model (“integrated care”) was introduced in 2012 in the Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, wherein patients had to actively subscribe to the integrated care program. This integrated care model was replaced after 2 years by a subscription-free “model project,” in which all patients insured by the contracting insurance company took part in the program. Data showed that the introduction of the integrated care program in the inpatient setting led to an increase of the average length of stay in this group. The switch to the model project corrected this unwanted effect but failed in significantly decreasing the average length of stay when compared to standard care. However, both the integrated care program and model project succeeded in reducing the length of stay in the day care setting. When adjusting for the sex and diagnosis proportions of each year, it was shown that diagnosis strongly influenced the average length of stay in both settings, whereas sex only slightly influenced the duration of stay in the inpatient setting. Thus, in spite of strong financial and clinical incentives, the introduction of the model project couldn’t fulfill its primary purpose of shifting resources from the inpatient to the outpatient setting in the initial years. Possible explanations, including struggle against long-established traditions and reluctance to change, are discussed.
机译:过去几年中,德国引入了旨在加强门诊部门服务的新护理模式。最初,2012年,伊曼纽尔·克林尼克·吕德斯多夫(Immanuel KlinikRüdersdorf)引入了基于订阅的模型(“综合护理”),患者必须积极参与综合护理计划。 2年后,该综合护理模式被免费订阅的“模型项目”所取代,该项目由订约保险公司投保的所有患者都参加了该计划。数据显示,在住院环境中引入综合护理计划导致该组患者的平均住院时间增加。转到模型项目后,纠正了这种不良影响,但与标准护理相比,未能显着缩短平均住院时间。但是,综合护理计划和模型项目都成功地减少了在日间护理环境中的住院时间。调整每年的性别和诊断比例后,结果表明,诊断对两种环境的平均住院时间均产生重大影响,而性别仅对住院环境的住院时间稍有影响。因此,尽管有强大的财务和临床激励措施,但最初的示范项目的引入仍无法实现其将资源从住院资源转移到门诊患者的主要目的。讨论了可能的解释,包括与悠久的传统作斗争和不愿改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号