首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Characterization of the Skin Microbiota of the Cane Toad Rhinella cf. marina in Puerto Rico and Costa Rica
【2h】

Characterization of the Skin Microbiota of the Cane Toad Rhinella cf. marina in Puerto Rico and Costa Rica

机译:甘蔗蟾蜍莱茵菌的皮肤微生物群的表征。波多黎各和哥斯达黎加的码头

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rhinella marina is a toad native to South America that has been introduced in the Antilles, likely carrying high loads of microorganisms, potentially impacting local community diversity. The amphibian skin is involved in pathogen defense and its microbiota has been relatively well studied, however, research focusing on the cane toad microbiota is lacking. We hypothesize that the skin microbial communities will differ between toads inhabiting different geographical regions in Central America and the Caribbean. To test our hypothesis, we compared the microbiota of three populations of R. cf. marina toads, two from Costa Rican (native) and one Puerto Rican (exotic) locations. In Costa Rica, we collected 11 toads, 7 in Sarapiquí and 4 from Turrialba while in Puerto Rico, 10 animals were collected in Santa Ana. Separate swab samples were collected from the dorsal and ventral sites resulting in 42 samples. We found significant differences in the structure of the microbial communities between Puerto Rico and Costa Rica. We detected as much as 35 different phyla; however, communities were dominated by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Alpha diversity and richness were significantly higher in toads from Puerto Rico and betadiversity revealed significant differences between the microbiota samples from the two countries. At the genus level, we found in Santa Ana, Puerto Rico, a high dominance of Kokuria, Niabella, and Rhodobacteraceae, while in Costa Rica we found Halomonas and Pseudomonas in Sarapiquí, and Acinetobacter and Citrobacter in Turrialba. This is the first report of Niabella associated with the amphibian skin. The core microbiome represented 128 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) mainly from five genera shared among all samples, which may represent the symbiotic Rhinella’s skin. These results provide insights into the habitat-induced microbial changes facing this amphibian species. The differences in the microbial diversity in Puerto Rican toads compared to those in Costa Rica provide additional evidence of the geographically induced patterns in the amphibian skin microbiome, and highlight the importance of discussing the microbial tradeoffs in the colonization of new ecosystems.
机译:莱茵假单胞菌是一种原产于南美的蟾蜍,已被引入安的列斯群岛,可能携带大量微生物,并可能影响当地社区的多样性。两栖动物的皮肤参与病原体的防御,其微生物群已经得到了比较充分的研究,但是,缺乏针对甘蔗蟾蜍微生物群的研究。我们假设居住在中美洲和加勒比地区不同地理区域的蟾蜍之间的皮肤微生物群落会有所不同。为了检验我们的假设,我们比较了R. cf.的三个种群的微生物群。滨海蟾蜍,其中两个来自哥斯达黎加(本地),另一个来自波多黎各(异国)地区。在哥斯达黎加,我们收集了11只蟾蜍,在萨拉皮基收集了7只蟾蜍,在图里亚尔巴收集了4只蟾蜍,而在波多黎各,在圣安娜收集了10只动物。从背侧和腹侧部位分别收集拭子样品,得到42个样品。我们发现波多黎各和哥斯达黎加之间的微生物群落结构存在显着差异。我们检测到多达35种不同的门。然而,社区以变形杆菌,拟杆菌,硬毛菌和放线菌为主。来自波多黎各的蟾蜍的α多样性和丰富度显着更高,β多样性揭示了两国微生物群样品之间的显着差异。在属水平上,我们在波多黎各的圣安娜(Santa Ana),库库里亚(Kokuria),尼亚贝拉(Niabella)和红杆菌科(Rhodobacteraceae)占主导地位,而在哥斯达黎加,在萨拉皮基(Sarapiquí)发现了Halomonas和Pseudomonas,在图里亚尔巴(Turrialba)发现了不动杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌。这是Niabella与两栖动物皮肤相关的首次报道。核心微生物组代表128个操作生物分类单位(OTU),主要来自所有样品中共有的5个属,这可能代表着共生莱茵兰的皮肤。这些结果提供了对这种两栖动物面临的由栖息地引起的微生物变化的见解。与哥斯达黎加相比,波多黎各蟾蜍的微生物多样性有所不同,这提供了两栖动物皮肤微生物组中地理诱导模式的进一步证据,并强调了在新生态系统定殖中讨论微生物权衡的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号