首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)
【2h】

Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

机译:儿科胃食管反流临床实践指南:北美儿科胃肠病肝病和营养学会(NASPGHAN)和欧洲儿科胃肠病学肝病和营养学会(ESPGHAN)的联合建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This document serves as an update of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2009 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children and is intended to be applied in daily practice and as a basis for clinical trials. Eight clinical questions addressing diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic topics were formulated. A systematic literature search was performed from October 1, 2008 (if the question was addressed by 2009 guidelines) or from inception to June 1, 2015 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was applied to define and prioritize outcomes. For therapeutic questions, the quality of evidence was also assessed using GRADE. Grading the quality of evidence for other questions was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS) and Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tools. During a three-day consensus meeting, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. In cases where no randomized controlled trials (RCT; therapeutic questions) or diagnostic accuracy studies were available to support the recommendations, expert opinion was used. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique.With this approach, recommendations regarding evaluation and management of infants and children with GERD to standardize and improve quality of care were formulated. Additionally, two algorithms were developed, one for infants < 12 months of age and the other for older infants and children.
机译:本文档是北美小儿胃肠病,肝病和营养学会(NASPGHAN)和欧洲小儿胃肠病,肝病和营养学会(ESPGHAN)2009诊断和管理胃食管反流病( GERD),旨在用于日常实践中并作为临床试验的基础。提出了八个临床问题,涉及诊断,治疗和预后方面。系统从2008年10月1日(如果该问题已通过2009准则解决)或从开始到2015年6月1日使用Embase,MEDLINE,Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane对照临床试验中央注册系统进行了文献检索。建议评估,制定和评估的分级方法(GRADE)用于定义结果并确定其优先级。对于治疗性问题,还使用GRADE评估了证据质量。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)和预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具对其他问题的证据质量进行分级。在为期三天的共识会议上,所有建议均已讨论并定稿。如果没有随机对照试验(RCT;治疗性问题)或诊断准确性研究可支持该建议,则使用专家意见。小组成员使用名义投票技术对每条建议进行投票。通过这种方法,制定了有关评估和管理GERD婴幼儿以规范和改善护理质量的建议。此外,还开发了两种算法,一种适用于12个月以下的婴儿,另一种适用于较大的婴儿和儿童。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号