首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Addressing variability in the acoustic startle reflex for accurate gap detection assessment
【2h】

Addressing variability in the acoustic startle reflex for accurate gap detection assessment

机译:解决声学惊吓反射中的变化以进行准确的间隙检测评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The acoustic startle reflex (ASR) is subject to substantial variability. This inherent variability consequently shapes the conclusions drawn from gap-induced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (GPIAS) assessments. Recent studies have cast doubt as to the efficacy of this methodology as it pertains to tinnitus assessment, partially, due to variability in and between data sets. The goal of this study was to examine the variance associated with several common data collection variables and data analyses with the aim to improve GPIAS reliability. To study this the GPIAS tests were conducted in adult male and female CBA/CaJ mice. Factors such as inter-trial interval, circadian rhythm, sex differences, and sensory adaptation were each evaluated. We then examined various data analysis factors which influence GPIAS assessment. Gap-induced facilitation, data processing options, and assessments of tinnitus were studied. We found that the startle reflex is highly variable in CBA/CaJ mice, but that this can be minimized by certain data collection factors. We also found that careful consideration of temporal fluctuations of the ASR and controlling for facilitation can lead to drastically divergent GPIAS results. Finally, we show that tinnitus decreases gap-induced inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex, but only for short gap durations. This study provides a guide for reducing variance in the GPIAS methodology – thereby improving the diagnostic power of the test.
机译:听觉惊吓反射(ASR)会发生很大的变化。因此,这种内在的可变性决定了从间隙诱发的惊吓反射(GPIAS)评估的脉冲前抑制所得出的结论。最近的研究对这种方法与耳鸣评估有关的有效性产生了怀疑,部分原因是数据集之间和数据集之间存在差异。这项研究的目的是检查与几个常见数据收集变量和数据分析相关的方差,以提高GPIAS的可靠性。为了研究这一点,在成年雄性和雌性CBA / CaJ小鼠中进行了GPIAS测试。分别评估了试验间隔,昼夜节律,性别差异和感觉适应性等因素。然后,我们检查了影响GPIAS评估的各种数据分析因素。研究了间隙诱导的促进,数据处理选项和耳鸣评估。我们发现惊吓反射在CBA / CaJ小鼠中变化很大,但是可以通过某些数据收集因素将其最小化。我们还发现,仔细考虑ASR的时间波动并控制便利化可能导致GPIAS结果大相径庭。最后,我们显示耳鸣减少了间隙诱发的对声音惊吓反射的抑制,但仅在较短的间隙持续时间内。这项研究为减少GPIAS方法的差异提供了指南,从而提高了测试的诊断能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号