首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Null Effects on Working Memory and Verbal Fluency Tasks When Applying Anodal tDCS to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus of Healthy Participants
【2h】

Null Effects on Working Memory and Verbal Fluency Tasks When Applying Anodal tDCS to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus of Healthy Participants

机译:将阳极tDCS应用于健康参与者的下额回中时对工作记忆和言语流畅性任务的无效影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique used to modify cognition by modulating underlying cortical excitability via weak electric current applied through the scalp. Although many studies have reported positive effects with tDCS, a number of recent studies highlight that tDCS effects can be small and difficult to reproduce. This is especially the case when attempting to modulate performance using single applications of tDCS in healthy participants. Possible reasons may be that optimal stimulation parameters have yet to be identified, and that individual variation in cortical activity and/or level of ability confound outcomes. To address these points, we carried out a series of experiments in which we attempted to modulate performance in fluency and working memory probe tasks using stimulation parameters which have been associated with positive outcomes: we targeted the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and compared performance when applying a 1.5 mA anodal current for 25 min and with sham stimulation. There is evidence that LIFG plays a role in these tasks and previous studies have found positive effects of stimulation. We also compared our experimental group (N = 19–20) with a control group receiving no stimulation (n = 24). More importantly, we also considered effects on subgroups subdivided according to memory span as well as to more direct measures of executive function abilities and motivational levels. We found no systematic effect of stimulation. Our findings are in line with a growing body of evidence that tDCS produces unreliable effects. We acknowledge that our findings speak to the conditions we investigated, and that alternative protocols (e.g., multiple sessions, clinical samples, and different stimulation polarities) may be more effective. We encourage further research to explore optimal conditions for tDCS efficacy, given the potential benefits that this technique poses for understanding and enhancing cognition.
机译:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种用于通过通过头皮施加的弱电流来调节潜在的皮层兴奋性来改变认知能力的技术。尽管许多研究报告了tDCS的积极作用,但最近的许多研究强调tDCS的作用可能很小且难以复制。在健康参与者中尝试使用tDCS的单次应用来调节性能时,尤其如此。可能的原因可能是尚未确定最佳刺激参数,并且皮质活动和/或能力水平的个体差异混淆了结果。为了解决这些问题,我们进行了一系列实验,其中我们尝试使用与积极结果相关的刺激参数来调节流畅性和工作记忆探测任务的表现:我们针对左下额回(LIFG)并比较了表现施加1.5 mA阳极电流25分钟并假刺激时。有证据表明,LIFG在这些任务中起作用,并且先前的研究已经发现刺激的积极作用。我们还比较了实验组(N = 19-20)和未接受刺激的对照组(n = 24)。更重要的是,我们还考虑了对根据记忆范围细分的亚组的影响,以及对执行功能能力和动机水平的更直接衡量。我们没有发现刺激的系统性作用。我们的发现与越来越多的证据表明tDCS产生不可靠的影响是一致的。我们承认我们的发现符合我们调查的情况,并且替代方案(例如,多次疗程,临床样本和不同的刺激极性)可能更有效。考虑到该技术为理解和增强认知带来的潜在好处,我们鼓励开展进一步研究以探索tDCS疗效的最佳条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号