首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Endoscopic versus Open Bursectomy for Prepatellar and Olecranon Bursitis
【2h】

Endoscopic versus Open Bursectomy for Prepatellar and Olecranon Bursitis

机译:内窥镜与开放性囊切除术治疗Pre骨前和鹰嘴滑囊炎

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectivesBursitis of the olecranon and the patella are not rare disorders, and conservative management is successful in most cases. However, when patients do not respond to conservative treatment, open excisional surgery or, recently, endoscopic bursectomy, can be used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open and endoscopic treatments of olecranon and prepatellar bursitis.Patients and methodsForty-nine patients (37 male and 12 female), who were treated with endoscopic bursectomy (25 patients) or open bursectomy (24 patients) were included in this study. Thirty patients had olecranon bursitis, while 19 patients had prepatellar bursitis. The patients’ average age was 61.1 ± 12.3 (range 33-81) years. All of the patients’ hospitalization and surgery times were recorded.The satisfaction of the patients was evaluated with a satisfaction scoring system, as well as by evaluating residual pain, the range of joint movement, and the cosmetic results of the procedure.ResultsThe average follow-up time was 16 ± 9 months (range 12–27). The median operation time was 23.2 ± 3.5 minutes for the endoscopic bursectomy group and 26.4 ± 6.8 minutes for the open bursectomy group. The median hospitalization time was 0.56 ± 0.5 days (range 0-1 day) for the endoscopic group and 1 ± 0 days for the open bursectomy group (P<0.01).According to the patient satisfaction questionnaire, the endoscopic bursectomy group’s score was 8.5 ± 1.3 (range 5-10), and the open bursectomy group’s score was 5.29 ± 1.8 (range 1-9) (P<0.01).ConclusionEndoscopic bursectomy is a time-saving and efficient surgical treatment option for patients with prepatellar and olecranon bursitis.
机译:鹰嘴囊炎和the骨炎并不是罕见的疾病,在大多数情况下保守治疗是成功的。但是,当患者对保守治疗无反应时,可采用开放式切除术或最近内镜下行囊切除术。这项研究的目的是评估开放和内镜下治疗鹰嘴和pat前滑囊炎的结果。患者和方法49例患者(男37例,女12例)接受了内窥镜囊肿切除术(25例)或开放囊肿切除术(24例)患者)被纳入这项研究。鹰嘴滑囊炎30例,pat前滑囊炎19例。患者的平均年龄为61.1±12.3(33-81岁)。记录所有患者的住院和手术时间,通过满意度评分系统评估患者的满意度,并通过评估残余疼痛,关节活动范围和手术的美容效果来评估患者的满意度。起床时间为16±9个月(范围12-27)。内窥镜囊肿切除术组的中位手术时间为23.2±3.5分钟,而开放性囊肿切除术组的中位手术时间为26.4±6.8分钟。内窥镜组的住院时间中位数为0.56±0.5天(0-1天的范围),开放性囊切除术组的中位住院时间为1±0天(P <0.01)。根据患者满意度调查表,内镜囊肿切除术组的得分为8.5 ±1.3(范围5-10),开放性囊切除术组的评分为5.29±1.8(范围1-9)(P <0.01)。结论内镜下囊肿切除术是pat骨前和鹰嘴囊肿治疗的一种省时,有效的外科手术选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号