首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Evaluating the Specificity of Cognitive Control Deficits in Schizophrenia Using Antisaccades Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Healthy Individuals With Poor Cognitive Control
【2h】

Evaluating the Specificity of Cognitive Control Deficits in Schizophrenia Using Antisaccades Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Healthy Individuals With Poor Cognitive Control

机译:使用抗扫视功能磁共振成像和认知控制较差的健康个体评估精神分裂症认知控制缺陷的特异性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cognitive control impairments in schizophrenia (SZ) can be evaluated using antisaccade tasks and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Studies, however, often compare people with SZ to high performing healthy people, making it unclear if antisaccade-related disruptions are specific to the disease or due to generalized deficits in cognitive control. We included two healthy comparison groups in addition to people with SZ: healthy people with high cognitive control (HCC), who represent a more typical comparison group, and healthy people with low cognitive control (LCC), who perform similarly on antisaccade measures as people with SZ. Using two healthy comparison groups may help determine which antisaccade-related deficits are specific to SZ (distinguish SZ from LCC and HCC groups) and which are due to poor cognitive control (distinguish the LCC and SZ groups from the HCC group). People with SZ and healthy people with HCC or LCC performed an antisaccade task during fMRI acquisition. LCC and SZ groups showed under-activation of saccade circuitry. SZ-specific disruptions were observed in the left superior temporal gyrus and insula during error trials (suppression of activation in the SZ group compared to the LCC and HCC group). Differences related to antisaccade errors may distinguish people with SZ from healthy people with LCC.
机译:可以使用反扫视任务和功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)评估精神分裂症(SZ)的认知控制障碍。然而,研究经常将患有SZ的人与表现良好的健康人进行比较,因此尚不清楚是否与抗扫视有关的干扰是该疾病特有的,还是由于认知控制的普遍缺陷所致。除SZ人群外,我们还包括两个健康的比较组:认知控制(HCC)较高的健康人群(代表更典型的比较人群)和认知控制低(LCC)较低的健康人群,其抗扫视措施的表现与人相似与SZ。使用两个健康的比较组可能有助于确定哪些抗Saccade相关的缺陷是SZ特有的(将LC与SCC区分为SZ),哪些是由于认知控制差(将LCC和SZ与HCC区分出)。 SMRI患者和HCC或LCC健康人在fMRI采集期间执行了抗扫视任务。 LCC和SZ组显示扫视电路的激活不足。在错误试验期间(与LCC和HCC组相比,SZ组的激活抑制),在左上颞回和岛中观察到了SZ特异性破坏。与抗扫视误差有关的差异可能会将SZ人与健康LCC人区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号