首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Interspecies Interactions in Relation to Root Distribution Across the Rooting Profile in Wheat-Maize Intercropping Under Different Plant Densities
【2h】

Interspecies Interactions in Relation to Root Distribution Across the Rooting Profile in Wheat-Maize Intercropping Under Different Plant Densities

机译:不同植物密度下小麦-玉米间作中种间相互作用与根系分布的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In wheat-maize intercropping systems, the maize is often disadvantageous over the wheat during the co-growth period. It is unknown whether the impaired growth of maize can be recovered through the enhancement of the belowground interspecies interactions. In this study, we (i) determined the mechanism of the belowground interaction in relation to root growth and distribution under different maize plant densities, and (ii) quantified the “recovery effect” of maize after wheat harvest. The three-year (2014–2016) field experiment was conducted at the Oasis Agriculture Research Station of Gansu Agricultural University, Wuwei, Northwest China. Root weight density (RWD), root length density (RLD), and root surface area density (RSAD), were measured in single-cropped maize (M), single-cropped wheat (W), and three intercropping systems (i) wheat-maize intercropping with no root barrier (i.e., complete belowground interaction, IC), (ii) nylon mesh root barrier (partial belowground interaction, IC-PRI), and (iii) plastic sheet root barrier (no belowground interaction, IC-NRI). The intercropped maize was planted at low (45,000 plants ha−1) and high (52,000 plants ha−1) densities. During the wheat/maize co-growth period, the IC treatment increased the RWD, RLD, and RSAD of the intercropped wheat in the 20–100 cm soil depth compared to the IC-PRI and IC-NRI systems; intercropped maize had 53% lower RWD, 81% lower RLD, and 70% lower RSAD than single-cropped maize. After wheat harvest, the intercropped maize recovered the growth with the increase of RWD by 40%, RLD by 44% and RSAD by 11%, compared to the single-cropped maize. Comparisons among the three intercropping systems revealed that the “recovery effect” of the intercropped maize was attributable to complete belowground interspecies interaction by 143%, the compensational effect due to root overlap by 35%, and the compensational effect due to water and nutrient exchange (CWN) by 80%. The higher maize plant density provided a greater recovery effect due to increased RWD and RLD. Higher maize plant density stimulated greater belowground interspecies interaction that promoted root growth and development, strengthened the recovery effect, and increased crop productivity.
机译:在小麦-玉米间作系统中,玉米在共生时期通常比小麦不利。尚不清楚是否可以通过增强地下种间相互作用来恢复受损的玉米生长。在这项研究中,我们(i)确定了不同玉米植物密度下地下相互作用与根系生长和分布有关的机制,并且(ii)定量了小麦收获后玉米的“恢复效果”。这项为期三年(2014-2016年)的田间试验在西北农业大学的甘肃农业大学绿洲农业研究站进行。在单作玉米(M),单作小麦(W)和三个间作系统(i)小麦中测量了根重密度(RWD),根长度密度(RLD)和根表面积密度(RSAD) -玉米间作,没有根部屏障(即完全地下相互作用,IC),(ii)尼龙网状根部屏障(部分地下相互作用,IC-PRI),以及(iii)塑料薄板根部屏障(无地下相互作用,IC-NRI )。间作玉米的种植密度低(45,000株ha -1 )和高(52,000株ha -1 )。在小麦/玉米共生期间,与IC-PRI和IC-NRI系统相比,IC处理增加了20-100 cm土壤深度间作小麦的RWD,RLD和RSAD。间作玉米与单作玉米相比,其RWD降低了53%,RLD降低了81%,RSAD降低了70%。小麦收获后,与单作玉米相比,间作玉米恢复了生长,RWD增加了40%,RLD增加了44%,RSAD增加了11%。三种间作系统之间的比较表明,间作玉米的“恢复效果”可归因于地下地下物种间的完全相互作用为143%,根部重叠引起的补偿效果为35%,以及水分和养分交换的补偿效果( CWN)。由于RWD和RLD增加,较高的玉米植株密度提供了更大的恢复效果。较高的玉米植物密度刺激了地下之间更大的种间相互作用,从而促进了根的生长和发育,增强了恢复效果,并提高了作物生产力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号