首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Utility of a Brief Web-Based Prevention Intervention as a Universal Approach for Risky Alcohol Use in College Students: Evidence of Moderation by Family History
【2h】

The Utility of a Brief Web-Based Prevention Intervention as a Universal Approach for Risky Alcohol Use in College Students: Evidence of Moderation by Family History

机译:基于简短的基于网络的预防干预作为大学生中高风险饮酒的通用方法的效用:家庭史证明的适度证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Alcohol use on college campuses is prevalent and contributes to problems that affect the health, emotional wellbeing, and academic success of college students. Risk factors, such as family history of alcohol problems, predict future alcohol problems, but less is known about their potential impact on intervention effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an intervention implemented in a non-randomized sample of drinking and non-drinking college freshmen.>Methods: Freshmen college students recruited for the intervention study (n = 153) completed a web-adaptation of the Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) at the start of spring semester. We compared their 30-days post-intervention alcohol initiation, number of drinking days (DAYS), drinks per occasion (DRINKS), maximum drinks in 24 h (MAX24) and alcohol use disorder symptoms (AUDsx) to 151 comparison participants retrospectively matched on demographics and baseline alcohol use behaviors. We also tested baseline DRINKS, DAYS, AUDsx, MAX24, and parental family history (PFH) of alcohol problems as moderators of the effect of the intervention.>Results: At follow-up, intervention participants had lower rates of AUDsx than comparison participants, especially among baseline drinkers. Among participants drinking 3+ days/month at baseline, intervention participants showed fewer DAYS at follow-up than the comparison group participants. BASICS was also associated with a decreased likelihood of initiation among baseline non-drinkers. PFH significantly interacted with treatment group, with positive PFH intervention participants reporting significantly fewer AUDsx at follow-up compared to positive PFH comparison participants. We found no evidence for an effect of the intervention on DRINKS or MAX24 in our analyses.>Conclusions: Results suggest some indication that novel groups, such as non-drinkers, regular drinkers, and PFH positive students may experience benefits from BASICS. Although conclusions were limited by lack of randomization and short follow-up period, PFH positive and low to moderate drinking groups represent viable targets for future randomized studies.
机译:>背景:大学校园中的饮酒行为很普遍,并且助长了影响大学生健康,情绪健康和学业成功的问题。诸如酗酒问题的家族病史等风险因素可以预测未来的酗酒问题,但对它们对干预效果的潜在影响的了解较少。这项研究的目的是检验在非随机饮酒和非饮酒大学新生样本中实施干预的效果。>方法:招募参加干预研究的大学新生(n = 153) )在春季学期开始时完成了针对大学生的简短酒精筛查和干预(BASICS)的网络改编。我们将他们的干预后30天开始饮酒,每天的饮酒天数(DAYS),每次饮酒(DRINKS),24小时内的最大饮酒量(MAX24)和酒精使用障碍症状(AUDsx)与151例回顾性匹配的参与者进行了比较人口统计学和基线饮酒行为。我们还测试了基线饮水,天数,AUDsx,MAX24和父母的酒精中毒史(PFH)作为干预效果的调节剂。>结果:在随访中,干预参与者的发生率较低相比比较参与者,尤其是基线饮酒者中的澳币(AUDsx)。在基线时喝3天/月以上的参与者中,干预参与者的随访天数少于对照组。 BASICS还与基线非饮酒者中引发的可能性降低有关。 PFH与治疗组之间存在显着相互作用,与阳性PFH比较参与者相比,阳性PFH干预参与者在随访时报告的AUDsx明显更少。在我们的分析中,我们没有发现干预措施对DRINKS或MAX24产生影响的证据。>结论:结果表明,某些迹象表明,新人群,例如非饮酒者,经常饮酒者和PFH阳性学生可能会经历受益于BASICS。尽管结论由于缺乏随机性和随访时间短而受到限制,但PFH阳性和中低度饮酒人群仍是未来随机研究的可行目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号