首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Poor Science; Poorly Trained Scientists; Poor Policies: MajorDeterrents to the War on Cancer
【2h】

Poor Science; Poorly Trained Scientists; Poor Policies: MajorDeterrents to the War on Cancer

机译:科学差;训练有素的科学家;政策不佳:重大威慑抗癌战争

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although the availability of funding has been described as the major limitation on advances in cancer, the progress in the war on cancer has been deterred mainly by poor science, poorly trained scientists, and poor NIH policies. This is the result of NIH policies of its extreme focus on molecular biology (genomics, molecular genetics, molecular biology) identification of the molecular factors and pathways; which are required for the acceptability of treatment and preventive protocols. As such, this has influenced virtually all agencies that provide grants for medical research to adopt the NIH policies. This has impacted the funding of the research as well as the focus of the training of scientists. Directors of NCI Dr. Varmus (also Nobel Prize awardee) and Dr. Zerhouni had addressed this issue; and they rejected the necessity of molecular biology studies and information. NIH should return to the holistic physiological/pathophysiological approach to studies of cancer issues. This would provide the best approach for winning the war on cancer.
机译:尽管资金的可获得性被描述为对癌症进展的主要限制,但是抗癌战争的进展主要是由于科学水平低下,训练有素的科学家缺乏以及NIH政策的缺乏而受到阻碍。这是NIH极端重视分子生物学(基因组学,分子遗传学,分子生物学)分子因素和途径识别政策的结果。可接受的治疗和预防方案。因此,这几乎影响了所有为医学研究提供资助以采用NIH政策的机构。这影响了研究的资金以及科学家培训的重点。 NCI的董事Varmus博士(也是诺贝尔奖获得者)和Zerhouni博士解决了这个问题。他们拒绝了分子生物学研究和信息的必要性。 NIH应该回到整体生理/病理生理学方法研究癌症问题。这将是赢得抗癌战争的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号