首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Brain Activation Covaries with Reported Criminal Behaviors When Making Risky Choices: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory Approach
【2h】

Brain Activation Covaries with Reported Criminal Behaviors When Making Risky Choices: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory Approach

机译:做出风险选择时脑部活动的协变量与报告的犯罪行为的比较:模糊追踪理论方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Criminal behavior has been associated with abnormal neural activity when people experience risks and rewards or exercise inhibition. However, neural substrates of mental representations that underlie criminal and noncriminal risk-taking in adulthood have received scant attention. We take a new approach, applying fuzzy-trace theory, to examine neural substrates of risk preferences and criminality. We extend ideas about gist (simple meaning) and verbatim (precise risk-reward tradeoffs) representations used to explain adolescent risk-taking to uncover neural correlates of developmentally inappropriate adult risk-taking. We tested predictions using a risky-choice framing task completed in the MRI scanner, and examined neural covariation with self-reported criminal and noncriminal risk-taking. As predicted, risk-taking was correlated with a behavioral pattern of risk preferences called “reverse framing” (preferring sure losses over a risky option and a risky option over sure gains, the opposite of typical framing biases) that has been linked to risky behavior in adolescents and is rarely observed in nondisordered adults. Experimental manipulations confirmed processing interpretations of typical framing (gist-based) and reverse-framing (verbatim-based) risk preferences. In the brain, covariation with criminal and noncriminal risk-taking was observed predominantly when subjects made reverse-framing choices. Noncriminal risk-taking behavior was associated with emotional reactivity (amygdala) and reward motivation (striatal) areas, whereas criminal behavior was associated with greater activation in temporal and parietal cortices, their junction, and insula. When subjects made more developmentally typical framing choices, reflecting non-preferred gist processing, activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex covaried with criminal risk-taking, which may reflect cognitive effort to process gist while inhibiting preferred verbatim processing.
机译:当人们遭受风险和报酬或运动抑制时,犯罪行为与异常的神经活动有关。然而,作为成年犯罪和非犯罪风险承担基础的心理表征的神经基础很少受到关注。我们采用模糊跟踪理论,采用一种新方法来检查风险偏好和犯罪的神经基础。我们扩展了关于要点(简单含义)和逐字记录(精确的风险-收益折衷)表示的概念,这些表示用于解释青少年的风险承担,以发现发育不当的成人风险承担的神经相关性。我们使用在MRI扫描器中完成的冒险选择框架任务测试了预测,并检查了神经协变与自我报告的犯罪和非犯罪风险承担。如预期的那样,冒险行为与被称为“逆向框架”的风险偏好行为模式相关联(与风险行为相关的反向偏好)(相对于有风险的选择,确定损失优先于有风险的选择,相对于确定的收益优先选择有风险的选择)。在青少年中很少见,在无障碍的成年人中很少见到。实验操作证实了对典型取景(基于要点)和逆取景(基于verbatim)风险偏好的处理解释。在大脑中,当受试者做出反向取景选择时,主要观察到与犯罪和非犯罪风险的协变。非犯罪冒险行为与情绪反应(杏仁核)和奖励动机(纹状体)区域相关,而犯罪行为与颞叶和顶叶皮层,它们的交界处和岛突的更大激活相关。当受试者做出更具发展性的典型取景选择,反映出非优选的gist加工时,背外侧前额叶皮层的激活与犯罪风险承担相关联,这可能反映了认知加工gist的努力,同时抑制了首选的逐字处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号