首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Cumulative Effects of Low Impact Development on Watershed Hydrology in a Mixed Land-Cover System
【2h】

Cumulative Effects of Low Impact Development on Watershed Hydrology in a Mixed Land-Cover System

机译:混合土地覆盖系统中低影响开发对流域水文的累积影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Low Impact Development (LID) is an alternative to conventional urban stormwater management practices, which aims at mitigating the impacts of urbanization on water quantity and quality. Plot and local scale studies provide evidence of LID effectiveness; however, little is known about the overall watershed scale influence of LID practices. This is particularly true in watersheds with a land cover that is more diverse than that of urban or suburban classifications alone. We address this watershed-scale gap by assessing the effects of three common LID practices (rain gardens, permeable pavement, and riparian buffers) on the hydrology of a 0.94 km2 mixed land cover watershed. We used a spatially-explicit ecohydrological model, called Visualizing Ecosystems for Land Management Assessments (VELMA), to compare changes in watershed hydrologic responses before and after the implementation of LID practices. For the LID scenarios, we examined different spatial configurations, using 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% implementation extents, to convert sidewalks into rain gardens, and parking lots and driveways into permeable pavement. We further applied 20 m and 40 m riparian buffers along streams that were adjacent to agricultural land cover. The results showed overall increases in shallow subsurface runoff and infiltration, as well as evapotranspiration, and decreases in peak flows and surface runoff across all types and configurations of LID. Among individual LID practices, rain gardens had the greatest influence on each component of the overall watershed water balance. As anticipated, the combination of LID practices at the highest implementation level resulted in the most substantial changes to the overall watershed hydrology. It is notable that all hydrological changes from the LID implementation, ranging from 0.01 to 0.06 km2 across the study watershed, were modest, which suggests a potentially limited efficacy of LID practices in mixed land cover watersheds.
机译:低影响开发(LID)是传统城市雨水管理实践的替代方法,其目的是减轻城市化对水量和水质的影响。地块和地方规模研究提供了LID有效性的证据;但是,人们对LID做法的总体分水岭规模影响知之甚少。在土地覆盖比仅城市或郊区分类更多样化的流域中,尤其如此。我们通过评估三种常见的LID做法(雨水花园,透水路面和河岸缓冲带)对0.94 km 2 混合土地覆盖流域的水文影响,来解决这一分水岭规模的差距。我们使用了空间明晰的生态水文模型,称为土地管理评估可视化生态系统(VELMA),以比较实施LID实施之前和之后流域水文响应的变化。对于LID场景,我们使用25%,50%,75%和100%的实现程度检查了不同的空间配置,以将人行道转换为雨花园,并将停车场和车道转换为可渗透的人行道。我们还沿着与农业土地覆盖物相邻的河流应用了20 m和40 m的河岸缓冲带。结果表明,在所有类型和构造的LID中,地下浅层径流和入渗以及蒸散量总体增加,峰值流量和地表径流减少。在单独的LID实践中,雨水花园对流域总体水平衡的每个组成部分影响最大。正如预期的那样,LID实践在最高实施级别上的结合导致整个流域水文学的最实质性变化。值得注意的是,在整个研究流域中,LID实施后的所有水文变化(从0.01到0.06 km 2 )都是适度的,这表明LID做法在混合土地覆盖流域中的功效可能有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号