首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches
【2h】

Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches

机译:对降噪器进行降噪:微生物组序列纠错方法的独立评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High-depth sequencing of universal marker genes such as the 16S rRNA gene is a common strategy to profile microbial communities. Traditionally, sequence reads are clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a defined identity threshold to avoid sequencing errors generating spurious taxonomic units. However, there have been numerous bioinformatic packages recently released that attempt to correct sequencing errors to determine real biological sequences at single nucleotide resolution by generating amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). As more researchers begin to use high resolution ASVs, there is a need for an in-depth and unbiased comparison of these novel “denoising” pipelines. In this study, we conduct a thorough comparison of three of the most widely-used denoising packages (DADA2, UNOISE3, and Deblur) as well as an open-reference 97% OTU clustering pipeline on mock, soil, and host-associated communities. We found from the mock community analyses that although they produced similar microbial compositions based on relative abundance, the approaches identified vastly different numbers of ASVs that significantly impact alpha diversity metrics. Our analysis on real datasets using recommended settings for each denoising pipeline also showed that the three packages were consistent in their per-sample compositions, resulting in only minor differences based on weighted UniFrac and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. DADA2 tended to find more ASVs than the other two denoising pipelines when analyzing both the real soil data and two other host-associated datasets, suggesting that it could be better at finding rare organisms, but at the expense of possible false positives. The open-reference OTU clustering approach identified considerably more OTUs in comparison to the number of ASVs from the denoising pipelines in all datasets tested. The three denoising approaches were significantly different in their run times, with UNOISE3 running greater than 1,200 and 15 times faster than DADA2 and Deblur, respectively. Our findings indicate that, although all pipelines result in similar general community structure, the number of ASVs/OTUs and resulting alpha-diversity metrics varies considerably and should be considered when attempting to identify rare organisms from possible background noise.
机译:通用标记基因(例如16S rRNA基因)的深度测序是分析微生物群落的常见策略。传统上,序列读段会以定义的同一性阈值聚类到可操作的分类单位(OTU)中,以避免产生虚假分类单位的测序错误。但是,最近发布了许多生物信息学软件包,这些软件包试图通过产生扩增子序列变异体(ASV)来纠正测序错误,以单核苷酸分辨率确定真实​​的生物序列。随着越来越多的研究人员开始使用高分辨率的ASV,需要对这些新颖的“降噪”管线进行深入而公正的比较。在本研究中,我们对模拟,土壤和宿主相关社区中三个最广泛使用的降噪包(DADA2,UNOISE3和Deblur)以及开放参考97%的OTU集群管道进行了全面比较。我们从模拟社区分析中发现,尽管它们基于相对丰度产生了相似的微生物成分,但这些方法却发现了数量极大不同的ASV,这些ASV极大地影响了α多样性指标。我们对使用每个降噪管道推荐设置的真实数据集进行的分析还显示,这三个程序包的每个样本组成均保持一致,仅基于加权UniFrac和Bray-Curtis不相似性导致了很小的差异。在分析真实土壤数据和其他两个与主机相关的数据集时,DADA2倾向于找到比其他两个降噪管道更多的ASV,这表明它可以更好地发现稀有生物,但要以可能的假阳性为代价。与所有测试数据集中的去噪管线中的ASV数量相比,开放参考OTU聚类方法识别出更多的OTU。三种降噪方法的运行时间明显不同,UNOISE3的运行速度分别比DADA2和Deblur快1200倍和15倍。我们的发现表明,尽管所有管道都产生了相似的总体群落结构,但ASV / OTU的数量以及由此产生的α多样性指标差异很大,在尝试从可能的背景噪声中识别稀有生物时应予以考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号