首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers
【2h】

Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers

机译:值得少花钱:为什么男人(和女人)贬低以护理为导向的职业

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present research, we applied a goal-congruity perspective – the proposition that men and women seek out roles that afford their internalized values () – to better understand the degree to which careers in healthcare, early education, and domestic roles (HEED; ) are devalued in society. Our first goal was to test the hypothesis that men, relative to women, are less interested in pursuing HEED careers in part because they are less likely than women to endorse communal values. A second, more novel goal was to extend goal congruity theory to examine whether gender differences in communal values also predict the belief that HEED careers add worth to society and are deserving of higher salaries. In three studies of undergraduate students (total N = 979), we tested the predictive role of communal values (i.e., a focus on caring for others), as distinct from agentic values (i.e., a focus on status, competition, and wealth; ). Consistent with goal congruity theory, Studies 1 and 2 revealed that men’s lower interest in adopting HEED careers, such as nursing and elementary education, was partially mediated by men’s (compared to women’s) lower communal values. Extending the theory, all three studies also documented a general tendency to see HEED as having relatively lower worth to society compared to STEM careers. As expected, communal values predicted perceiving higher societal worth in HEED careers, as well as supporting increases in HEED salaries. Thus, gender differences in communal values accounted for men’s (compared to women’s) tendency to perceive HEED careers as having less societal worth and less deserving of salary increases. In turn, gender differences in perceived societal worth of HEED itself predicted men’s relatively lower interest in pursuing HEED careers. In no instance, did agentic values better explain the gender difference in HEED interest or perceived worth. These findings have important implications for how we understand the value that society places on occupations typically occupied by women versus men.
机译:在目前的研究中,我们采用了目标一致性的观点(即男人和女人寻找具有内在价值的角色的命题()的命题),以更好地了解医疗,早期教育和家庭角色的职业程度(HEED; )在社会上贬值。我们的第一个目标是检验以下假设:相对于女性,男性对追求HEED事业的兴趣较小,部分原因是,与女性相比,他们不太可能赞同社区价值观。第二个更新颖的目标是扩展目标一致性理论,以检验社区价值观中的性别差异是否也预示了HEED职业可以为社会增加价值并应获得更高薪水的信念。在三项针对本科生的研究中(总N = 979),我们测试了与代理价值观(即关注地位,竞争和财富)不同的社区价值观(即关注他人)的预测作用。 )。与目标一致性理论相一致,研究1和2表明,男性对从事HEED职业(如护理和基础教育)的兴趣较低,部分是由男性(与女性相比)较低的社区价值观引起的。扩展理论,所有这三项研究还记录了一种普遍的趋势,即与STEM事业相比,HEED对社会的价值相对较低。正如预期的那样,公共价值预测将在HEED的职业中感知更高的社会价值,并支持HEED薪资的增长。因此,在公共价值观上的性别差异导致男性(相对于女性)倾向于将HEED职业视为社会价值较低且应得的薪水增长较少的趋势。反过来,HEED本身在社会价值上的性别差异也预示着男性在追求HEED事业方面的兴趣相对较低。在任何情况下,代理价值观都不能更好地解释HEED兴趣或感知价值上的性别差异。这些发现对我们如何理解社会对女性和男性通常从事的职业的价值具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号