首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Review of Relative Pollen Productivity Estimates From Temperate China for Pollen-Based Quantitative Reconstruction of Past Plant Cover
【2h】

A Review of Relative Pollen Productivity Estimates From Temperate China for Pollen-Based Quantitative Reconstruction of Past Plant Cover

机译:中国温带地区基于花粉的过去植物覆盖数量的定量重建相对花粉生产力估计值的综述。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Model-based quantitative reconstruction of past plant cover in Europe has shown great potential for: (i) testing hypotheses related to Holocene vegetation dynamics, biodiversity, and their relationships with climate and land use; (ii) studying long term interactions between climate and land use. Similar model-based quantitative reconstruction of plant cover in China has been restricted due to the lack of standardized datasets of existing estimates of relative pollen productivity (RPP). This study presents the first synthesis of all RPP values available to date for 39 major plant taxa from temperate China and proposes standardized RPP datasets that can be used for model-based quantitative reconstructions of past plant cover using fossil pollen records for the region. We review 11 RPP studies in temperate China based on modern pollen and related vegetation data around the pollen samples. The study areas include meadow, steppe and desert vegetation, various woodland types, and cultural landscapes. We evaluate the strategies of each study in terms of selection of study areas and distribution of study sites; pollen- and vegetation-data collection in field; vegetation-data collection from satellite images and vegetation maps; and data analysis. We compare all available RPP estimates, select values based on precise rules and calculate mean RPP estimates. We propose two standardized RPP datasets for 31 (Alt1) and 29 (Alt2) plant taxa. The ranking of mean RPPs (Alt-2) relative to Poaceae (= 1) for eight major taxa is: Artemisia (21) > Pinus (18.4) > Betula (12.5) > Castanea (11.5) > Elaeagnaceae (8.8) > Juglans (7.5) > Compositae (4.5) > Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae (4). We conclude that although RPPs are comparable between Europe and China for some genera and families, they can differ very significantly, e.g., Artemisia, Compositae, and Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae. For some taxa, we present the first RPP estimates e.g. Castanea, Elaeagnaceae, and Juglans. The proposed standardized RPP datasets are essential for model-based reconstructions of past plant cover using fossil pollen records from temperate China.
机译:基于模型的欧洲过去植物覆盖率的定量重建显示出巨大的潜力:(i)测试与全新世植被动态,生物多样性及其与气候和土地利用的关系有关的假设; (ii)研究气候与土地利用之间的长期相互作用。由于缺乏相对花粉生产力(RPP)的现有估计的标准化数据集,中国类似的基于模型的植物覆盖率定量重建受到限制。这项研究提出了迄今为止来自中国温带的39种主要植物分类群的所有RPP值的首次综合,并提出了标准化的RPP数据集,可用于使用该地区的化石花粉记录对过去的植物覆盖率进行基于模型的定量重建。我们基于现代花粉和花粉样品周围的相关植被数据,回顾了中国温带地区的11个RPP研究。研究领域包括草地,草原和沙漠植被,各种林地类型和文化景观。我们根据研究区域的选择和研究地点的分布来评估每个研究的策略;现场采集花粉和植被数据;从卫星图像和植被图收集植被数据;和数据分析。我们比较所有可用的RPP估计值,根据精确规则选择值,然后计算平均RPP估计值。我们针对31种植物(Alt1)和29种植物(Alt2)提出了两个标准化RPP数据集。相对于禾本科(= 1)的八个主要分类群的平均RPP(Alt-2)排名为:蒿(21)>松(18.4)>桦(12.5)>栗(11.5)> El科(8.8)>胡桃( 7.5)>菊科(4.5)> mar菜科/藜科(4)。我们得出的结论是,尽管RPP在某些属和科之间在欧洲和中国之间具有可比性,但它们之间的差异可能非常明显,例如蒿,菊科和A科/藜科。对于某些分类单元,我们将提供第一个RPP估算值,例如栗、,科和胡桃木。拟议的标准化RPP数据集对于使用来自中国温带的化石花粉记录进行的基于模型的过去植物覆盖度重建至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号