首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens (COMET): A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of a Transdiagnostic Treatment and a Measurement Feedback System
【2h】

Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens (COMET): A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of a Transdiagnostic Treatment and a Measurement Feedback System

机译:青少年情绪障碍结果监测的社区研究(COMET):转诊治疗和测量反馈系统的比较有效性试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emotional disorders, encompassing a range of anxiety and depressive disorders, are the most prevalent and comorbid psychiatric disorders in adolescence. Unfortunately, evidence-based psychosocial therapies typically focus on single disorders, are rarely adopted by community mental health center clinicians, and effect sizes are modest. This article describes the protocol for a comparative effectiveness study of two novel interventions designed to address these challenges. The first intervention is a transdiagnostic treatment (the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents, UP-A), a promising new approach that uses a small number of common strategies to treat a broad range of emotional disorders, and their underlying shared emotional vulnerabilities. The second intervention is a standardized measurement feedback system, the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire (YOQ), designed to improve clinical decision making using weekly symptom and relational data. The three study arms are treatment as usual (TAU), TAU plus the YOQ (TAU+), and UP-A (used in combination with the YOQ). The primary aims of the study are to (1) compare the effects of the UP-A and TAU+ to TAU in community mental health clinics, (2) to isolate the effects of measurement and feedback by comparing the UP-A and TAU+ condition, and (3) to examine the mechanisms of action of both interventions. Design considerations and study methods are provided to inform future effectiveness research.
机译:情绪障碍,包括一系列焦虑症和抑郁症,是青春期最普遍,最常见的精神疾病。不幸的是,基于证据的社会心理疗法通常只针对单一疾病,社区心理健康中心临床医生很少采用这种疗法,而且效果大小适中。本文介绍了针对两种旨在解决这些挑战的新型干预措施进行比较有效性研究的方案。第一种干预措施是透诊断治疗(《青少年情感障碍经透诊治疗统一协议》,UP-A),这是一种很有前途的新方法,该方法使用少量的通用策略来治疗广泛的情感障碍,以及它们的潜在共享情感脆弱性。第二种干预措施是标准化的测量反馈系统,即“青年成果问卷”(YOQ),旨在利用每周症状和相关数据改善临床决策。三个研究部门分别为常规治疗(TAU),TAU加YOQ(TAU +)和UP-A(与YOQ结合使用)。该研究的主要目的是(1)在社区心理健康诊所中比较UP-A和TAU +与TAU的作用;(2)通过比较UP-A和TAU +的情况来隔离测量和反馈的作用, (3)研究两种干预的作用机制。提供设计注意事项和研究方法,以为将来的有效性研究提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号